beautiful decay

Here’s another recently com­pleted image in my Destruc­tive Test­ing series, “Com­par­a­tive Wilt Test.”

James SOE NYUN: Comparative Wilt Test


James SOE NYUN: Com­par­a­tive Wilt Test: Oenothera, Osteosper­mum, Oxalis. Dig­i­tal pig­ment print, 16 x 20 inches.

The orig­i­nal pho­tos were taken in the late 90s, and my orig­i­nal inten­tion was to print them sequen­tially so that you could see the wilt­ing in process. I tried that, but then decided it wasn’t inter­est­ing enough. Recently I decided to revisit some of the neg­a­tives using Pho­to­shop. I ended up super­im­pos­ing five of the orig­i­nal images and used dif­fer­ent kinds and degrees of trans­parency for each layer. I like this result much bet­ter, though I could also see this turn­ing into a stop-motion video at some point.

The image memo­ri­al­izes a pseudo-science exper­i­ment I con­ducted to see how three dif­fer­ent flow­er­ing plants would behave when cut off the mother plant, lashed to some sup­ports, then allowed to wilt over the course of sev­eral days. The vic­tims in this case are three plants in the gar­den I was hav­ing some ill feel­ings towards: Mex­i­can evening prim­rose (Oenothera spe­ciosa), free­way daisy (Osteosper­mum fru­ti­co­sum), and Bermuda but­ter­cup (Oxalis pes-caprae).

My prim­rose prob­lems went back to a packet of “wild­flower seed” that I’d pur­chased as a sou­venir at the Grand Canyon in the early 1990s. The pic­ture on the packet was appeal­ing: del­i­cate pink flow­ers on a dainty plant. And they were wild­flow­ers! At first I was thrilled that the sprin­kling of seed I applied to some des­o­late ground in the front yard started to ger­mi­nate. I was even hap­pier when there was that first extrav­a­gant first flow­er­ing, with dozens to hun­dreds of the papery, soft pink flow­ers cov­er­ing the plants so you couldn’t see the bar­ren ground anymore.

Okay, if you know the plant, I can tell you’re laugh­ing and know where this is headed… But as I soon found out, as pretty as it is, this is one aggres­sive plant, reseed­ing tena­ciously and spread­ing quickly by putting out dense webs of under­ground run­ners. More than ten years later, I’m still pulling at the stems that con­tinue to come up in that bed. And even though they’re wild­flow­ers, they’re not native to San Diego. For­tu­nately for the local ecosys­tem, they haven’t escaped from the bed where I naively gave them the gift of life.

Plant num­ber two, the free­way daisy, had sim­i­lar issues. It started out life as a tiny plant in a four-inch pot but soon spread like a demon, swal­low­ing up a num­ber of lit­tle annu­als that stood in its way. At least the plant didn’t reseed much, and the stems, though they can some­times set down root, were easy enough to control.

The final plant, the Bermuda but­ter­cup, is a com­mon and obnox­ious weed over much of coastal South­ern Cal­i­for­nia. Dur­ing its peak bloom in the mid­dle of spring the perky yel­low flow­ers over the attrac­tive clover-ish leaves are a nice sight. But once you have it, you’ll prob­a­bly have it forever.

June 24 2008 04:02 am | Categories: artmy gardenphotographyplant profiles | Tags:

One Response to “beautiful decay”

  1. Pomona Belvedere on 03 Jan 2011 at 3:15 pm #

    I love this exper­i­ment and also the photo. And since you explained the plants thor­oughly, I also under­stand the per­sonal (not the sci­en­tific) rea­son for it. Still, I’m curi­ous: which wilted first?

    Some­times I think wilt­ing bou­quets are almost more inter­est­ing than the lush, fresh ones. Depends on the bou­quet though!

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply