inspired by nature: how plants grow

This is the last in this lit­tle series of posts on how nature has shaped what we do artis­ti­cally, con­tin­u­ing on the post on the book, Inspired by Nature: Plants: The Building/Botany Con­nec­tion.

The ear­lier post talked about the overt nat­ural pat­terns that archi­tects have incor­po­rated into their works. The authors of this book also talk in more con­cep­tual terms about how the way plants grow could also help us under­stand how build­ings are designed.

One of the plant growth pat­terns is that of the epi­phyte, a plant that grows on the branches of another plant. In this way the sec­ond plant can gain access to higher lev­els of light high in a for­est. Just think of the many trop­i­cal orchids and bromeli­ads that use this strat­egy, liv­ing high in the tree­tops, enjoy­ing the brighter light and pro­tec­tion that a tree­top loca­tion affords.

Find­ing a par­al­lel in the archi­tec­tural realm the authors pro­pose this project by the Dutch firm, Kor­te­knie Stuhlmacher Archi­tecten. The Las Pal­mas Par­a­site sits on top of another struc­ture in Rot­ter­dam, The Nether­lands. By using the struc­ture below, this lit­tle green addi­tion takes advan­tage of the views and sun­light avail­able dozens of feet up with­out the need to build a tall foun­da­tional under­struc­ture to get it up so high in the rooftops. Although called a “par­a­site” even by the archi­tects, the project sits fairly benignly on its host, enjoy­ing the loca­tion, but not drink­ing up its pre­cious plant juices. To prove this point, the lit­tle struc­ture was dis­man­tled a few years after it was planted here on the rooftop, prob­a­bly with min­i­mal effect on the ware­houses below. [ source ]

A true par­a­site has a more marked effect on the health of its plant host. Plants like mistle­toe and dod­der use another plant for sup­port, as do epi­phytes, but they also tap into the host’s reserves and draw nutri­tion directly from it, some­times con­tribut­ing to the death of the host.

Archi­tec­tural equiv­a­lents of this are prob­a­bly a lot more com­mon­place than that of the epiphyte–You prob­a­bly have a neigh­bor with a room addi­tion or remodel that seems to suck the life juices out of the orig­i­nal build­ing. This book pro­pose a cou­ple exam­ples of archi­tec­tural par­a­sites, one of them being this Fire and Police Sta­tion in Berlin by Sauer­bruch Hut­ton Archi­tects. Here the bright red-and-green glass struc­ture hangs onto the frame of the orig­i­nal tra­di­tional brick struc­ture. I’m not sure it’s suck­ing the host’s juices dry, but it cer­tainly is mak­ing itself felt more assertively than with the epi­phyte above.

And the last exam­ple I wanted to share was one employ­ing the plant char­ac­ter­is­tic of the for­est canopy. The trees of trop­i­cal forests grow up and up, often cre­at­ing a thin con­cen­tra­tion of green­ery high above the for­est floor, with tall naked tree trunks sup­port­ing the high-altitude garden.

An archi­tec­tural equiv­a­lent is the Sharp Cen­tre for Design in Toronto, built by Alsop Archi­tects. This oth­er­worldly build­ing hov­ers high above the build­ings below, like high tree­tops hov­er­ing high above the shade-loving plants of the under­storey far below. [ source ]

Wild, eh?

None of these projects “fit it” in any tra­di­tional sense. The new build­ings don’t rely on mim­ic­k­ing how the exist­ing archi­tec­ture looks. But to me these build­ings have the same sense of happy coex­is­tence that well-paired plants in the gar­den have. You can appre­ci­ate the indi­vid­u­als, but together they make some­thing new and interesting.

September 24 2008 04:40 am | Categories: artgardeningplaces | Tags:

2 Responses to “inspired by nature: how plants grow”

  1. Greg on 30 Sep 2008 at 7:52 am #

    I’m get­ting caught up on your great posts–I’ve looked a few times, but usu­ally at home late at night on my cruddy color-blind monitor…forgive me delay­ing com­ment­ing ’til I could see it right from the office!

    This build­ings are just nutty…but def­i­nitely inter­est­ing. With few excep­tions, I’m game to con­sider just about any archi­tec­tural form, although admit­tedly, some just don’t work. I like the red and green glass on the police/fire sta­tion, and would’ve enjoyed a larger photo to exam­ine more closely.

    The one with the bare legs that hov­ers over the train tracks is quite bizarre and interesting…I think we don’t get a proper sense of the scale of that build­ing, and won­der just what part of the busi­ness that sec­tion houses…

  2. lostlandscape on 30 Sep 2008 at 7:59 pm #

    These build­ings are def­i­nitely out there. I have no idea how well they func­tion but they do make their state­ments. “Next time I’m in Stuttgart” (yah right) I’ll take you a bet­ter pic­ture of that cool build­ing with the red and green glass… The pic­ture in the book was pretty clear and impres­sive, tho.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply