Archive for January, 2009

expressive irrigation

Only a cou­ple areas of the gar­den are on auto­matic water­ing with ded­i­cated sprin­klers. The rest of the gar­den has to depend on rain­full and the gar­dener drag­ging a hose over to what­ever needs to be watered. I’m sure that reduces how much I water because I’m very con­scious of how long I’m stand­ing there with the hose and how moist the soil appears to be getting.

hoseartIt’s been warm for the last cou­ple of weeks, and a month since the last rains, so I’ve been doing a cer­tain amount of water­ing. But I’ve also been mak­ing lit­tle line draw­ings with the hose…

sprinklerartAnd how many of you have this same sprin­kler head? I try no to anthro­mor­phize things too much, bust this sprin­kler always seems to be star­ing back at me quizzically.

January 19 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy gardenrambles | Tags: | 5 Comments »

um, how do you pronounce that?

Am I the only one with prob­lems with how to pro­nounce the Latin names for plants?

Last fall I was at a nurs­ery and noticed a gor­geous stand of grasses in their demon­stra­tion gar­den. What was it, I asked?

JFj­faljsld­jfla­js­dljf pur­purea,” the woman said.

I stared at her for a cou­ple sec­onds. I’m sure my jaw was dropped and I looked pretty stu­pid. I worked back­wards from the part I rec­og­nized, “pur­purea,” and finally under­stood that she’d just told me that the plants were Aris­tida pur­purea, pur­ple three-awn.

To her credit she hadn’t actu­ally said “JFj­faljsld­jfla­js­dljf” for the genus name. Instead it was a very flat, American-style pro­nun­ci­a­tion that came out some­thing like “Uh-RIS-tuh-duh.” I’d seen the name on paper a lot before that moment, but I’d never heard some­one pro­nounce it. All along I was hold­ing a very dif­fer­ent sound in my head, some­thing more like “Ah-ree-STEE-dah.”

In my under­grad­u­ate years study­ing music I was required to sing in the cho­rus. Two of the pieces we sang, Bach’s B-minor mass and Mozart’s Ves­perae Solennes del Con­fes­sore, were in Latin. With Ancient Latin being a thor­oughly dead lan­guage, Singer’s Latin–basically Latin sung as if it were Italian–was what I’d learned.

With the air tense with mis­un­der­stand­ing and pur­ple three-awn blow­ing in the wind behind me, Amer­i­can Botan­i­cal Latin so rudely came face to face against my Singer’s Latin. Who was right?

I’d prob­a­bly guess both of us and no one. Botan­i­cal Latin over the years has been stud­ded with plant names hon­or­ing peo­ple and places whose names con­tain let­ters and sounds you’d never encounter old-school Latin. (Oer­stedella schwe­in­furthi­ana, any­one?) And who’s to say pro­nounc­ing Latin as if it were Ital­ian makes sense? Schol­ars now say that mod­ern Shake­spearean Eng­lish is pretty far removed from the orig­i­nal Eliz­a­bethan pro­nun­ci­a­tions. It stands to rea­son that mod­ern Ital­ian is much fur­ther sep­a­rated than that from its Latin source.

So, really, when you come down to it, we all talk with accents. And some­times, to make our­selves bet­ter under­stood, we have to adapt to the ways the peo­ple around us say things.

Aristida purpureaLeft: The plant that started all this, Aris­tida pur­purea, pho­tographed by Stan Shebs, from the Wiki­me­dia Com­mons, used under the Cre­ative Com­mons Share­Alike 2.5 license [ source ].

January 17 2009 | Categories: gardeningrambles | Tags: | 11 Comments »

quaking and shaking

The morn­ing was warm so I went up onto the deck to soak up a lit­tle of the Jan­u­ary sun­shine. While I was up there I noticed the wind shak­ing the leaves of one of the pot­ted plants grow­ing up there.

This is Euphor­bia cotini­fo­lia, a shrub in the same genus as the exalted poin­set­tia and the lowly and weedy spurges. Species like the quak­ing aspen tree (Pop­u­lus tremu­loides) get all the glory for hav­ing foliage that quiv­ers in the wind, but I thought the maroon leaves on this plant were doing a pretty good job of it.

This turns out to have been my first YouTube video upload. John’s lit­tle dig­i­tal Insta­matic has a movie mode that lets you cap­ture mov­ing snap­shots. The qual­ity isn’t what the per­fec­tion­ist in me would like for it to be, but like other snap­shots I think you get the idea what’s being pho­tographed…

January 16 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy garden | Tags: | 4 Comments »

bird’s nest fern

Ferns are some of my favorite plants. Their del­i­cate leaves and strong archi­tec­tural forms keep me look­ing at them. The lit­tle ginkgo-shaped leaves and black stems of the maid­en­hair fern have to be right up there among my favorite kinds of fern.

But with all the delicate-looking ferns to choose from, what’s got to be another of my favorite is the bird’s nest fern (Asple­nium sp.). Here are some close­ups of the sides of the undi­vided spears of a spec­i­men at San Diego’s Bal­boa Park.

balboa-park-botanical-building-fern-detail

balboa-park-botanical-building-fern-detail-4

balboa-park-botanical-building-fern-detail-3

balboa-park-botanical-building-fern-detail-2

January 14 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 5 Comments »

after a little more research…

If you read it on the inter­net it must be true, right? I’ve had some ques­tions about a recent post that relayed some infor­ma­tion on farm­ers in Iraq being pro­hib­ited from sav­ing seeds. After doing more detailed research it looks like some of the exact facts need to be scru­ti­nized a lit­tle more crit­i­cally. But your con­clu­sions on the sit­u­a­tion may not change much.

All the blus­ter revolves around Order 81, a direc­tive on plant vari­ety pro­tec­tion that Paul Bre­mer, the U.S. Coali­tion Pro­vi­sional Author­ity admin­is­tra­tor, pushed pushed into effect (at the behest of Mon­santo, accord­ing to a 2008 inter­view with F. William Eng­dahl). The press release from Focus on the Global South and GRAIN that got the firestorm of opin­ion going declares that, “while his­tor­i­cally the Iraqi con­sti­tu­tion pro­hib­ited pri­vate own­er­ship of bio­log­i­cal resources, the new US-imposed patent law intro­duces a sys­tem of monop­oly rights over seeds.” If you look at the cur­rent ver­sion of the release you’ll see that it’s all marked up with cor­rec­tions and clar­i­fi­ca­tions, with a piece of emphatic clar­i­fi­ca­tion at the begin­ning of the release:

The law does not pro­hibit Iraqi farm­ers from using or sav­ing “tra­di­tional” seeds. It pro­hibits them from reusing seeds of “new” plant vari­eties reg­is­tered under the law. In prac­ti­cal terms, this means they can­not save those seeds for re-use either.

So is Focus on the Global South and GRAIN think­ing the law is benign and just? Their press release may be con­trite about the con­fu­sion they might have caused, but in the cur­rent rewrit­ten ver­sion still goes on to decry the order as a slap in the face against food sov­er­eignty at the same time it dri­ves big agribusi­ness into the tra­di­tional ways of tra­di­tional peoples.

It’s all fas­ci­nat­ing read­ing that gives more nuance and back­ground to the con­clu­sions that peo­ple were com­ing to. In the end it’s not only a case about people’s ways of life being destroyed, nor is it a sim­ple case of pro­tect­ing intel­lec­tual prop­erty. Here are a few sam­ples of what’s out there:

Iraq’s new patent law: A dec­la­ra­tion of war against farm­ers (the orig­i­nal press release, 2004–5)

Iraq and Washington’s ‘seeds of democ­racy’ by William F. Eng­dahl (2005)

Why Iraqi Farm­ers Might Pre­fer Death to Paul Bremer’s Order 81 by Nancy Scola (2007)

And if you’re brave, here’s the order itself, 2004, with Paul Bremmer’s sig­na­ture: COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY ORDER NUMBER 81: PATENT, INDUSTRIAL DESIGN, UNDISCLOSED INFORMATION, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND PLANT VARIETY LAW

I really would like to see a con­tem­po­rary analy­sis of the sit­u­a­tion. Was all this blus­ter? Or has the sit­u­a­tion played out as many feared? Based on sto­ries of the social and envi­ron­men­tal costs of reliance on Mon­santo crops has cre­ated in some parts of India, for instance, I sus­pect things can’t be going well in Iraq.

January 14 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 3 Comments »

a fun gardening movie

Last July I did a post on the doc­u­men­tary A Man Named Pearl, and at point asked a ques­tion about what films there were about gar­den­ing. Leslie made the rec­om­men­da­tion of Green­fin­gers, a Y2K British pro­duc­tion star­ring Clive Owen and Helen Mir­rin. Based loosely on a true story, it told of incar­cer­ated gar­den­ers in Eng­land that had a reha­bil­i­ta­tion pro­gram involv­ing gar­den­ing. In real life the pris­on­ers even­tu­ally went on to design award win­ning gar­den exhibits at the Hamp­ton Court and Chelsea Flower Shows.

My Net­flix queue is pretty long, but by last week I’d worked through a few dozen films and the red enve­lope con­tain­ing Green­fin­gers arrived in the mail. I won’t give away the end any more than I have–It’s based only loosely on the facts I’ve men­tioned above. But if you haven’t seen it already it’s def­i­nitely a wor­thy movie rental–Warm, funny and roman­tic, it’s a great film for these long win­ter nights.

Now if only the film didn’t use so many plas­tic plants, includ­ing a red hibis­cus that fea­tures promi­nently in the plot. We’re gar­den­ers, peo­ple! We can tell!

January 12 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 7 Comments »

balboa park’s desert garden

Jan­u­ary can be an amaz­ing month for suc­cu­lents and other desert plants. Many aloes and agaves explode into bloom, and plants with ephemeral foliage are green with leaves in ways you don’t often see them.

balboa-park-succulent-bloom-overviewSan Diego’s Bal­boa Park houses one of the prime local col­lec­tion of cacti, suc­cu­lents and other desert dwellers from around the world. The Desert Gar­den, the larger of its two suc­cu­lent gar­dens, was estab­lished in 1976, but many of the plants are senior cit­i­zens much older than the age of the garden.

balboa-park-succulent-blooming-aloe-4

balboa-park-succulent-blooming-aloe-3

Aloes star in its Jan­u­ary land­scape, with red and orange torches of flow­ers that dou­ble as hum­ming­bird magnets.

balboa-park-succulent-blooming-aloe-2balboa-park-succulent-blooming-aloe

And shown here, lurk­ing in the shad­ows, is one of the local hum­ming­birds, stak­ing its territory.

balboa-park-succulent-silhouette-of-bird

balboa-park-succulent-dracaeno-draco-two-trees

Among the big, mature spec­i­mens are sev­eral dragon trees, Dra­caena draco. In this first photo, on the near trunk, you can see a red­dish patch where the plant’s red sap has dried. When cut, these plants ooze a fluid that in some Euro­pean leg­ends was pur­ported to be dragon’s blood, hence the plant’s name (draco = dragon).

balboa-park-succulent-dracaeno-draco-looking-up

balboa-park-succulent-dracaeno-draco-from-afar

This is a pub­lic gar­den, and so it’s sub­ject to fund­ing glitches and bat­tles over civic pri­or­i­ties. I’d con­sider the gar­den to be in great con­di­tion con­sid­er­ing those limitations.

One thing I would have loved to have seen, though, would be more plant labels. I encoun­tered so many inter­est­ing species, but very few of them had name tags. I have this thing about need­ing to know the name of a plant–Call me com­pul­sive. But the lack of labels drove me crazy. I real­ize, how­ever, that tags don’t come cheap. And in a wide-open pub­lic gar­den, labels can walk away with pieces of suc­cu­lents in the hands of evil plant addicts.

balboa-park-succulent-greyia-sutherlandii

One of the plants that was labeled was this Natal Bot­tle­brush, Greyia suther­landii. A bit scrappy-looking as a plant, but what great flowers!

balboa-park-succulent-alluaudia-procera
Also labeled was the Mada­gas­car ocotillo, Allu­au­dia pro­cera. I loved the spi­ral pat­tern­ing of its spines.

Another prob­lem with this being a pub­lic gar­den is that there are quite a few spec­i­mens where people’s temp­ta­tions to carve their ini­tials in the plant life got the bet­ter of them. This euphor­bia was scarred many times over. But that wasn’t going to stop it from blooming.

balboa-park-succulent-euphorbia-closeup

balboa-park-succulent-euphorbia-group

After vis­it­ing the gar­den I was sur­prised by how many shots I’d racked up in the cam­era. And for some rea­son, the major­ity of them were ver­ti­cals. Is there some­thing about succulents–particularly the upright-growing kinds that mimic the way a human stands–that scream out for pho­tograph­ing them in an upright orientation?

balboa-park-succulent-spent-yucca-stalks

Some yuc­cas, I think, with spent bloom stems.

balboa-park-succulent-boojum

Boo­jum trees, Fouquieria colum­naris, native to Baja Cal­i­for­nia. This plant is in the same genus as the Cal­i­for­nia desert’s spec­tac­u­lar ocotillo, which inter­est­ingly isn’t related to the Madas­car ocotillo, above.

balboa-park-succulent-bloom-overview-3

Aloes and kalan­choes in bloom.

balboa-park-succulent-looking-towards-florida-canyonThe main gar­den is a flat, easy stroll over wide decom­posed gran­ite path­ways. As part of a recent expan­sion, the gar­den now also includes this switch­back down into Florida Canyon, also part of Bal­boa Park. The plants along the descent are still young, but should look spec­tac­u­lar in a decade or so.

Not every­one in the world loves cac­tus and suc­cu­lents. They might point to the defen­sive spines many of the plants have, and they might say the sculp­tural shapes of the plants don’t look soft and cozy like leafy shrubs or fra­grant roses. balboa-park-succulent-spiny-rosesNext to the Desert Gar­den is Bal­boa Park’s rose gar­den. Dur­ing spring­time, thirty sec­onds of walk­ing would take you from the world of cac­tus and suc­cu­lents to a gar­den manic with flow­ers and heavy with the aroma of roses. But on this bright Jan­u­ary day, the adja­cent roses were pruned down to naked stems and pierc­ing thorns. It was the cac­tus and suc­cu­lents that looked warm and welcoming.

The Desert Gar­den is located across Park Boule­vard from the Nat­ural His­tory Museum on Bal­boa Park’s museum row. The gar­den has no walls, no entry fee, and is open 24/7, 365 days of the year.

If the 2.5 acres of the Desert Gar­den isn’t enough of a cac­tus and suc­cu­lent fix, cross Park Boule­vard and take a stroll over to the Bal­boa Park Club, maybe ten min­utes on foot, and take in the parks orig­i­nal 1935 cac­tus gar­den, which, accord­ing to the park’s web­site, was estab­lished “under the direc­tion of [San Diego gar­den­ing leg­end] Kate Ses­sions for the 1935 Cal­i­for­nia Pacific Inter­na­tional Expo­si­tion.” There you’ll find “some of the largest cac­tus and suc­cu­lent spec­i­mens in the Park,” along with a nice col­lec­tion of proteas.

January 11 2009 | Categories: gardeningphotographyplacesplant profiles | Tags: | 3 Comments »

seed saving banned?

View the update to this post here.

Here’s a bit of polit­i­cal unpleas­ant­ness I read about in a seed descrip­tion in the Baker Creek Heir­loom Seeds cat­a­log list­ing for the Iraqi tomato vari­ety, Rouge D’Irak:

Sav­ing seeds was made ille­gal under the “Colo­nial Pow­ers” of the United States. Under the new law, Iraqi farm­ers must only plant seeds from “pro­tected vari­eties” from inter­na­tional corporations.

First Hilibur­ton, then Black­wa­ter, and now mon­ster agribusi­ness tak­ing advan­tage of the war. I wish I was surprised.

The Baker Creek online cat­a­log actu­ally lists five dif­fer­ent plants of Iraqi ori­gin, in case you’d like to help pre­serve vari­eties that Iraqi farm­ers now can’t legally grow from their own seeds: four toma­toes, Tatar of Mon­golis­tan, Rouge D’Irak, Al-Kuffa, and Nin­eveh; along with a melon, Bagh­dad Long. Aren’t you heir­loom tomato spe­cial­ists look­ing for new vari­eties to try? How about these plants with an amaz­ing con­tem­po­rary history?

Doing some quick research on this I ran across a post­ing over at The Alchemist’s Gar­den that’s great read­ing. Take a look!

January 10 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 4 Comments »

an easy outdoor orchid

Orchids can be finicky crea­tures, espe­cially when you try to grow species that aren’t adapted to your grow­ing con­di­tions. If you’re lucky enough to live in an area with infre­quent freez­ing tem­per­a­tures (the warm end of zone 9B or in zone 10 or higher), many of the reed-stemmed epi­den­drums can be as easy to grow as any­thing in the gar­den and can be as inex­pen­sive as most other plants. But these also make easy house­plants if you have a nice south-facing window.

epidendrumtwocolorsIf they bear more than a pass­ing resem­blance to the flashy florist cat­t­leya orchids it’s no coincidence–They’re closely related mem­bers of the Cat­t­leya alliance of orchids.

The par­ent species for these plants orig­i­nate in Cen­tral Amer­ica, where they can some­times be seen grow­ing ram­pantly. Epi­den­drum rad­i­cans and E. ibaguense are tough and pro­lific, and will tol­er­ate tem­per­a­tures down to the high 20s.

To get the species them­selves, you’ll have to go to an orchid nurs­ery, but their hybrids can be had in many good gar­den cen­ters or nurs­eries. Col­ors come in every­thing from the par­ent species’  orange and red, to pink, salmon, rose, pur­ple, laven­der and white. The plants bloom almost the year round and will grow two to five feet tall, depend­ing on light and water­ing. They all make great starter orchids or good plants to use for landscaping.

Light

Epi­den­drums are hap­pi­est in bright light, from dap­pled shade to sev­eral hours of full sun. They will sur­vive in full sun, but the plants will be short, and the leaves may scorch on the hottest days. They’ll also grow in heavy shade, but the plants will grow tall, and you won’t see any flowers.

epidendrumplantThis is an exam­ple of plant that has been grown in fairly deep shade. The plant grows big, loose and floppy, and it only flow­ers on the stems that receive some direct sun.

Water

Low to mod­er­ate gar­den water is a good start­ing point for these epi­den­drums. They will tol­er­ate quite moist con­di­tions, and they can be sur­pris­ingly drought tol­er­ant. But they look best some­where in between.

Soil

You can grown these in spe­cial orchid mixes if you like, but mine have been happy stuck into average-to-sandy gar­den dirt. Plants grown in orchid mixes will require more water­ing. Any loose pot­ting mix would work well for plants in pots.

Prop­a­ga­tion

epidendrumkeikiFlow­er­ing stems, when they reach the end of their flow­er­ing life, usu­ally pro­duce new plants near their tips. Orchid grow­ers call these keikis, Hawai­ian for “babies.” These lit­tle plants will send out long white roots before long. Cut the rooted keikis off when the roots are two to four inches long and stick them where you’d like another plant, being care­ful not to break the brit­tle roots. The plants will often start bloom­ing within a year. Addi­tion­ally, epi­den­drums can be dug up and divided every few years.

If you get deeper into epi­den­drum species, you’ll also find species with brown, green and almost-blue flow­ers, some of them bicol­ors, some of them with out­ra­geous spot­ting. If you have the col­lec­tor gene in your DNA, you’ll find 1500 species to choose from. These spe­cialty epi­den­drums don’t nec­es­sar­ily have the same lust for life and tol­er­ance for cool tem­per­a­tures as the com­mon reed­stems do, so be sure to do some research before stick­ing them in a gar­den bed with your perennials.

January 09 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy gardenplant profiles | Tags: | 2 Comments »

greener gardening practices

I think that these days all of us are try­ing to go green in many aspects of our lives as we try to reduce our demands on the world’s resources. Gar­den­ing has the shiny green patina of com­muning with nature and being kind to plants and ani­mals that make up this green earth. But so many mod­ern gar­den­ing prac­tices con­sume big piles of the resources that we depend on, and oth­ers con­tributes sig­nif­i­cantly to envi­ron­men­tal pollution.

Since it’s early in the year, the time that we many of us make res­o­lu­tions, I’ve out­line some areas that I’ll be try­ing to work on in my own gar­den. I’ve gath­ered them together below and cat­e­go­rized them into the three big Rs of going green: reduce, reuse, and recycle.

Reduce

  1. Fewer annu­als: The semi-twisted logic of plant­ing annu­als, nur­tur­ing them for six months, and then yank­ing them out when they’re all bloomed out to replace them with other sea­sonal annu­als to enjoy for maybe just a few more months is start­ing to bother me. It’s a cer­tain amount of work on my part, and the energy that must go into the pro­duc­tion of bed­ding plants adds to what guilt I feel. I doubt I’ll give up on annu­als entirely. But I’ll try to rely on them less, mostly as tem­po­rary fillers until some­thing with year-round inter­est can take over. Alter­nately, a lot of annu­als reseed, so that you can plant them one year, and they’ll return reli­ably in future years. Ally­sum, zin­nias, melam­podium, celosia, pop­pies and many orna­men­tal grasses are just a few of the plants that reseed reliably.
  2. I’ll think twice before I pull out a plant. Is a plant really ill or dying? Or am I just bored with it?
  3. When I do decide that a plant has to go, I’ll work on using more plants that are bet­ter adapted to my envi­ron­ment. Liv­ing in San Diego, this means using more Mediterranean-adapted plants and plants native to the area. This will reduce needs for sup­ple­men­tal water, plant food and insect control.
  4. It’s more work, but I’m start­ing more plants from seed these days. Ship­ping a packet of seeds across the coun­try takes way less energy than ship­ping the bed-full of plants that many pack­ets will give you. Direct-sowing the seeds into the ground can save on trans­porta­tion costs for pot­ting mix and pots. Another bonus is that you can treat your­self to plenty more vari­eties than would be avail­able at the local nursery.
  5. In addi­tion to buy­ing more seeds to grow, I’m sav­ing more seeds from the plants I already have. For species and open-pollenated heir­loom plants, the seed should come true to the orig­i­nal. For hybrid plants, the seedlings can be an adven­ture, some of them com­ing look­ing like their par­ents, oth­ers com­ing out to be inter­est­ing mon­grel mixes.
  6. Grow more edi­ble plants. There’s the push to buy locally grown pro­duce, fruits and veg­gies that have been grown within a hun­dred miles of your house. Why not grow food your­self and drop the trans­porta­tion costs to zero? I’ve got var­i­ous herbs over­win­ter­ing in the gar­den, and seeds for var­i­ous plants are now in the ground or already ger­mi­nat­ing: kale, beets, ama­ranth, miner’s let­tuce, plus what­ever plants of romaine and New Zealand spinach will come back from seed. Sev­eral of these have ter­rific orna­men­tal value, so they’ll get to live with the more dec­o­ra­tive plantings.
  7. I want to learn more about how to pre­pare the edi­ble plants I already have. For instance, the cat­tails grow­ing in the pond in the back yard are often listed as being one of the sta­ples of the native Amer­i­can pop­u­la­tion in cen­turies past. Some of the local suc­cu­lent pop­u­la­tion of the genus Dud­leya also were used for food, and in fact one of the species is called edulis. (With a name like edulis, it’s gotta be good!) Maybe those and other plants in the gar­den could be relied on for occa­sional inter­est­ing meals. Even if some of them might be a lit­tle too weird for reg­u­lar con­sump­tion, eat­ing, like gar­den­ing, ought to be an adventure.

Reuse

  1. It’s not per­fect hor­ti­cul­tural hygiene, but I try to reuse pots when­ever pos­si­ble. Unfor­tu­nately I usu­ally end up with more gal­lon pots than I’ll ever be able to use a sec­ond or third time. Many nurs­eries will take them to reuse. And then I found that our almost-local native plant out­fit, Las Pil­i­tas Nurs­ery, will also donate 10 cents to the Cal­i­for­nia Native Plant Soci­ety for each pot that is returned for them to reuse. (That would explain the Lowes and Home Depot pots that I’ve seen at the nursery!)
  2. For those sit­u­a­tions when I decide a plant isn’t right for one spot, I’ll try to see if there’s another loca­tion in the gar­den where it would work bet­ter. Or may I know some­one who’d be dying to do some plant rescue…
  3. When I buy seeds, I some­times end up with more than I need. I’ll share them with inter­ested folks, and it could be an way to get more native or drought-tolerant plants into people’s gardens.

Recy­cle

  1. Stores often have last week’s bulbs on sale for not much money. If they’re bulbs adapted to the cli­mate, this is a great way to save some of these plants from the dump­sters. And if you’re into dumpster-diving or cruis­ing the back alleys of gar­den cen­ters, you might pick these up for free. Most of the nar­cis­sus in my yard came through these mark-downs.
  2. I’ll have to admit that I’m a failed com­poster. I just don’t have the magic com­bi­na­tion of time, space and dis­ci­pline (in all hon­esty it’s mostly the dis­ci­pline where I’m lack­ing). But the city for­tu­nately has a greens recy­cling pro­gram for those of us who don’t have this down. Kitchen scraps are already mak­ing it into the bins, and I’ll try to be be even more fanat­i­cal with any­thing green in the gar­den that would compost.
  3. If you’re not doing it already, recy­cle lawn lawn clip­pings into mulch. Last sum­mer I con­vinced John to put the onto the veg­gie gar­den instead of dump­ing them in the city greens recy­cling. This way they’re still get­ting recy­cled, only they don’t have to be trucked to the land­fill to be turned into mulch.
  4. Even if you can’t find some­one to reuse your plas­tic pots, there are some emerg­ing uses for them that might become avail­able to more parts of the coun­try. I’ll keep my eyes open in case there are inter­est­ing local recy­cling oppor­tu­ni­ties, like the one where pots would be melted down for “land­scape tim­bers.” (The link goes to an great pro­gram in Missouri.)
  5. Bro­ken clay pots make great cov­ers for drain holes in pots around the gar­den. They allow the water to drain out, but also reduce the amount of pot­ting soil that you lose.

Like many new year’s res­o­lu­tions, I know I won’t stick to them fanat­i­cally. One of the things that draws me to the plant world is the sheer vari­ety in all the cool plants that I can invite into my gar­den. I’m a col­lec­tor at heart, so say­ing no to a new and inter­est­ing spec­i­men is one of the hard­est things for me to do. I know that that’s going to be one of the hard­est goals to stick to. Hope­fully, putting it out in a pub­lic space like this post will pro­vide me a lit­tle gen­tle pres­sure and reminder of what I intended to do.

January 07 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy garden | Tags: | 6 Comments »

« Prev - Next »