the chrysanthemum problem

chrysanthemums-roadside1

All around town, both road­side and trail­side, the gar­land chrysan­the­mums have been blooming.

chrysanthemums-trailside1

The perky spawn of plants that have been grown for cen­turies in China and Japan for their tasty young green leaves, Chrysan­the­mum coro­nar­ium has come to be a big nui­sance in many dis­turbed areas of South­ern California.

chrysanthemums-closeup-white-and-yellow-forms1

But rather than get­ting all neg­a­tive and curs­ing the plant, let me try a dif­fer­ent tack to try to encour­age every­one to rip it out by its pretty lit­tle roots:

Did you know that 100 grams of boiled gar­land chrysan­the­mum pro­vides 51% of your rec­om­mended daily require­ments of vit­a­min A, 40% of vit­a­min C, 21% of iron, and has only 20 calo­ries? (That’s accord­ing to healthalicious.com.)

chrysanthemums-closeup-white1

OregonLive.com offers some kitchen ideas for gar­land chrysan­the­mum: “Lightly saute the leaves and stems or whole 4– to 6-inch seedlings with sesame seeds, gar­lic, gin­ger and soy sauce… Eat raw in salad, add to soups con­tain­ing fresh gin­ger, or dunk in frit­ter bat­ter and deep-fry.”

(Be sure your greens come from a site other than a road­side that might have been sprayed with her­bi­cides by the city. And be sure you’re eat­ing gar­land chrysan­the­mum instead of the some­what sim­i­lar bush sun­flower (encelia) or San Diego sun­flower (viguiera).)

chrysanthemums-closeup-yellow1

There are of course other rea­sons to pull up this plant. The Tijuana River National Estu­ar­ine Research Reserve site puts it suc­cinctly: “[C]hrysanthemum forms fields that over­take native plants such as Cal­i­for­nia buck­wheat and sagebrush–both these plants pro­vide food and shel­ter for native birds, insects and other animals.”

So in the end gar­land chrysan­the­mum is the per­fect weed. Whether you respond to thoughts of a healthy snack or to appeals of doing what you can to make the world a bet­ter place, you can get out your weed­ing tools and go to town.

A final thought: Wouldn’t it be great for green-conscious restau­rants to offer tasty and hip entrees on their menu that con­tain locally-harvested gar­land chrysan­the­mum greens that oth­er­wise would have been dam­ag­ing the ecosys­tem? Or maybe we could stock stalls at farmer’s mar­kets with piles of the stuff? Why not turn this over-abundant inva­sive plant into a resource that could be cropped, improv­ing the local land­scape at the same time?

Eat up, everyone!

This post is ded­i­cated to Out­of­doors, who first thought up the idea of ded­i­cat­ing the 13th of the month to posts on inva­sive species.

May 13 2009 05:49 am | Categories: landscapeplant profiles | Tags:

6 Responses to “the chrysanthemum problem”

  1. Pomona Belvedere on 14 May 2009 at 9:28 am #

    I had no idea this plant was a prob­lem in So Cal. I’ve only read about it in Chi­nese recipes, but I hadn’t ever got­ten the nutri­tion break­down. (I was think­ing this plant might be the trad Chi­nese rem­edy for heat, but I looked it up: that’s C. mor­ri­folium.) I like your idea for clear­ing inva­sives by using them as exotic restau­rant food (or in our larders). If we’ve come this far on recy­cling in the last 20 years, why not move ahead on stuff like this? It also helps cre­ate local industry…

  2. Charles on 14 May 2009 at 3:03 pm #

    Pretty flower and it’s neat that it can be cooked, eaten raw, and should be by the sound of it. I have a prob­lem in my yard with a plant called Mul­ti­flora rose. I want to get rid of it but my mom like the flowers.

  3. Steve on 15 May 2009 at 9:16 am #

    Don’t for­get the pesky Dan­de­lion! There’s another option in the tasty weed “jour­nal of fine eats”. Or Kin­nikin­nik, Indian Tobacco as it is known in the North West.

    I also had no idea the “mum” was such a nui­sance, James. It serves you right for liv­ing in Par­adise. ;-)

  4. wiseacre on 15 May 2009 at 7:48 pm #

    Did you know gar­land chrysan­the­mum goes for $20 a pound?

    I thought it best to start the rumor right away.

  5. lostlandscape on 15 May 2009 at 8:41 pm #

    Pomona, I think the idea came to me straight out of recy­cling and reusing. Putting them on a menu would raise aware­ness even if peo­ple didn’t par­tic­u­larly care for them. But with cen­turies of cook­ery behind them, they really must be delicious.

    Charles, it’s tough when peo­ple get attached to the pretty flow­ers! And the gar­land chrysan­the­mum has pretty flow­ers com­bined with tasty greens. I hope we’re not doomed to have it forever.

    Steve, ah the amaz­ing dent de lion–superbe! Such trou­bles here in par­adise. Yes we can eat some of our nox­ious weeds, though not far from the first stand of chrysan­the­mum was a superb stand of poi­son hem­lock. I wouldn’t sug­gest the same graz­ing strat­egy with those…

    Wiseacre, I like the way your mind works! I’m sure the $20 was the sale price.

  6. [ Lost in the Landscape ] » seed bomb controversies on 08 Oct 2010 at 4:03 pm #

    […] Not only does this mix include sweet alyssum, it con­tains gar­land chrysan­the­mum, one of our local scourges. Some parts of the coun­try also have prob­lems with the […]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply