my swamp creatures

sarracenia-leucophylla-tarnok

sarracenia-rubra

Here are some of the pitcher plants grow­ing in my guilty plea­sure bog gar­den, a small con­crete con­tainer in which I have more than a half dozen of these sar­race­nias and as many sun­dews. The guilty plea­sure part of this comes in when you con­sider that most of Cal­i­for­nia is now in its third year of drought, and when you real­ize that none of the plants in the bog gar­den likes to dry out. And prefer­ably they’d like to have their toes, though not all their roots, in stand­ing water.

sarracenia-alata

sarracenia-dixie-lace

sarracenia-minor

The genus Sar­race­nia is native mostly to wet zones in the East­ern and South­ern United States (with one species into Canada). The ones I’ve tried are prov­ing to be pretty easy to grow as long as they get sun­light and good-quality water. (I’ve prob­a­bly men­tioned before how mine get reverse osmo­sis water from the local water cafe instead of the hyper­chlo­ri­nated bong water that comes out of most South­ern Cal­i­for­nia spig­ots. So far, pro­vid­ing good water has been the most dif­fi­cult part of grow­ing these plants.)

These plants, left to right, top to bottom:

  1. Sar­race­nia rubra
  2. S. leu­co­phylla ‘Tarnok’
  3. S. x Dixie Lace
  4. S. alata
  5. S. minor


There’s also a closely related swamp thing that’s native to North­ern Cal­i­for­nia and Ore­gon. That plant, Dar­ling­to­nia cal­i­for­nica, how­ever, is as dif­fi­cult to grow in most loca­tions as it is stun­ning. If your can’t pro­vide sum­mer night tem­per­a­tures below 55 degrees, don’t bother with it. You’ll kill it. I killed mine. Not all native plants makes sense to grow if they’re not native to your envi­ron­ment! (If you really must do what I did and not as I say, you could try con­struct­ing a spe­cial dar­ling­to­nia box like they do in Japan to lower tem­per­a­tures around the plant.)

bog-garden-overview

So what’s the water use? Dur­ing the hottest months the lit­tle bog sur­vives on three to four 5-gallon serv­ings a month of water. That totals around 15–20 gal­lons for a space that’s about six or seven square feet, or about 2.1 to 3.3 gal­lons per square foot. I was a lit­tle shocked when I com­pared this num­ber to what one source says it takes to main­tain a typ­i­cal lawn over the sum­mer here in the coastal zone: 2.6–3.6 gal­lons per square foot.

Like, I can have a tiny lit­tle swamp gar­den for about the same amount of water it takes to sup­port an equiv­a­lent spot of aver­age lawn? And when you con­sider that most lawns are larger than six or seven square feet, I sud­denly feel a lit­tle less guilty about my lit­tle guilty plea­sure. And it made me look at lawns dif­fer­ently, that they’re just green swamps full of grass. I think I’d rather have my lit­tle bog garden.

(Full dis­clo­sure: We still do have a small patch of grass in the back­yard which gets greened up for the big Fourth-of-July party and then neglected most of the rest of the year. It helps to have heavy after­noon shade like we do to min­i­mize how much water a lawn requires. But when the guy who keeps it mowed and edged won’t do it any more (you know who you are), the lawn is history…)

July 02 2009 05:46 am | Categories: gardeningmy garden | Tags:

11 Responses to “my swamp creatures”

  1. tina on 02 Jul 2009 at 8:04 am #

    You should not feel guilty. I bet these plants add so much to the ecosys­tem that their lit­tle bit of water usage is jus­ti­fied. Bet­ter to put water in a bog than in a dry lawn. That is a los­ing bat­tle. I think these are so pretty and have thought of try­ing them, yet I just have so much already and am afraid to get any­thing new lately. The clos­est thing I have to a bog is a con­crete planter with acorus in it. That is one fine lit­tle plant, pretty adap­tive and such a good color and price, free from a plant swap. You take care and enjoy that bog.

  2. George J. Janczyn on 02 Jul 2009 at 8:47 am #

    So now you’re a bog blog too!

    hyper­chlo­ri­nated bong water” is a won­der­ful term. I got a hearty chuckle out of that.

    Your lawn water esti­mate sounds about right. In my neck of the chap­ar­ral, the Helix Water Dis­trict esti­mates 46 gal­lons per square foot per year (or 3.8 per month).

    As usual, out­stand­ing photos.

  3. Bird on 03 Jul 2009 at 3:20 am #

    What gor­geous alien crea­tures you have in your minia­ture swamp! I tried to do the maths in my head to work out how many baths per sum­mer your bog gar­den equals but maths is is not my best sub­ject — I just have a strong feel­ing that it’s not many, so in the scheme of things it’s not exactly greedy :)

    I hope I wasn’t too scorn­ful of the florist’s flower either, some­times I worry that I’ve become a hor­rid old killjoy through my thing for keep­ing stuff “nat­ural”. I like to think I’m not as puri­tan as I might come across…

    Oh by the way, I posted those orchids!

  4. lostlandscape on 03 Jul 2009 at 7:33 am #

    Tina, I’d say you did well in that plant swap. I’ve never grown acorus, though the pho­tos of it I’ve seen are cool. The var­ie­gated forms look about as spec­tac­u­lar as any­thing else grass-like.

    George, yah, it was a bog blog post­ing alright. I’ll leave it to oth­ers to do dog blogs or frog blogs or fog blogs or log blogs… Thanks for the com­ment on the pho­tos. You’re a lit­tle far­ther inland, so the higher water use num­bers aren’t surprising.

    Bird, I’m on my way to check out your orchid post­ings! As far as my bog, I’ve fig­ured that the aver­age water user in town uses as much water in a day as it takes me to keep the bog alive all year–I actu­ally do get assis­tance from the rain, though not much of it. And as far as your florist flower com­ments, I’m often right there with you. I have this fuzzy notion of a more nat­ural world in my head and that side of me comes out every now and then. I think a lit­tle bit of puri­tanism doesn’t hurt, espe­cially when it helps us keep our focus on impor­tant things like the nat­ural world.

  5. ryan on 03 Jul 2009 at 9:00 am #

    Pitcher plants are great. I’ve never grown one, but I really like them.
    I’m not sur­prised by the cal­cu­la­tions about your swamp ver­sus a lawn. Lawns are bad, and it would be great if the whole state of Cal­i­for­nia traded in all the front yard lawns for small bog gardens.

  6. susan morrison (garden-chick) on 03 Jul 2009 at 10:39 am #

    Have never done a bog gar­den but love the idea! A friend vis­ited my gar­den recently and sug­gested I add some water plants to my rather dull water fea­ture. Look­ing at your pho­tos is prod­ding me to fol­low through.

  7. elephant's eye on 03 Jul 2009 at 11:56 am #

    lawn is a just a green swamp full of grass” That is why we have NO lawn. 2 “creeks” which are dug out hol­lows with a grow­ing selec­tion of happy green plants. Another post in the off­ing. TX James

  8. Barbara E on 07 Jul 2009 at 1:48 pm #

    Another beau­ti­ful and thought-provoking post­ing! As you prob­a­bly know from my blog, I also have some lawn — though it is ever-shrinking. A bog, or other water-feature is a far cry from a green desert lawn. It pro­vides more diver­sity, the key ingre­di­ent to habi­tat. And I do agree that it using “native” plants — those from the same state but not local — is really no dif­fer­ent than intro­duc­ing a non-native, so if there aren’t any appro­pri­ate natives, go with what works as long as it isn’t inva­sive, which clearly yours are not. I dream of hav­ing an inter­est­ing water-feature: pond, bog, ver­nal pool.

  9. lostlandscape on 09 Jul 2009 at 9:04 pm #

    Ryan, every now and then I hear peo­ple say that lawns are ripar­ian areas or bogs that you mow…

    Susan, we also have a pond near the bog, and hav­ing one gives you access to a whole new world of plants. I doubt your water fea­ture is really “rather dull” but it’s hard to not make some­thing more inter­est­ing with the addi­tion of some plants.

    Elephant’s Eye, I’ve seen your post­ings on storks, and I doubt any self-respecting stork would come to frolic on a lawn.

    Bar­bara, I’m intrigued by the idea of hav­ing a ver­nal pool as a water fea­ture. I could see lin­ing part of the gar­den with an imper­vi­ous mem­brane, cov­er­ing it with soil, and plant­ing all sorts of rare and endan­gered ver­nal pool plants. It could go dry and wouldn’t be a water fea­ture half of the year, but that’d be what you see in the nat­ural ver­nal pools that are left.

  10. Barbara E on 09 Jul 2009 at 9:38 pm #

    Until April I worked at Ran­cho Santa Ana Botanic Gar­den in Clare­mont. They have a ver­nal pool gar­den with inter­est­ing and unusual plants. It is a fairly high main­te­nance area. If I remem­ber cor­rectly the depres­sions are lined. The water is allowed to evap­o­rate in sum­mer. Def­i­nitely more work than I would take on at home, but some­thing I think about.

  11. [ Lost in the Landscape ] » bog chronicles on 17 Mar 2010 at 6:32 am #

    […] The mid-sized pond turned out to be a crit­ter mag­net. Rum­mag­ing pos­sums and rac­coons ate all the fish and reg­u­larly upturned any water plants. Two years back it became my first bog gar­den, and is today filled with car­niv­o­rous sun­dews and pitcher plants. I was con­cerned about how much water a bog gar­den would require, but last year I fig­ured it out that it required only about as much water as an equiv­a­lent patch of grass. […]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply