in the pond

When we pur­chased the house it came with a nice, deep pond that was per­fect for waterlilies. It also came with an upper pond with a water­fall into the lily pond, and two other small ponds. Two decades later, one of the small ponds has now been con­verted into a planter, and another into my bog gar­den. Remain­ing are the two largest ponds, the lily pond and the upper pond, which we reduced in size by half.

lily

We’ve had waterlilies bloom­ing since the end of April. I have no idea what vari­ety this one is–It came with the pond that came with the house. But it’s a tough and reli­able plant.

cattal-plant

The ponds are mostly John’s ter­ri­tory, but I’ve sneaked a cou­ple Cal­i­for­nia native species into them. The first is a cat­tail (Typha sp.), one of my favorite water plants.

cattail-running

If you’ve ever grown these, you real­ize quickly that there’s a cer­tain amount of main­te­nance that goes with them, mainly in deal­ing with their spread­ing rhi­zomes. If the plant is pot­ted, it’ll soon escape and will require fre­quent trim­ming when grow­ing actively. Here are a cou­ple of shoots that have escaped into the fer­tile pond scum. In the past the shoots got tossed, but I just read in an excerpt from Steve Brill and Eve­lyn Brin’s Iden­ti­fy­ing and Har­vest­ing Edi­ble and Med­i­c­i­nal Plants in Wild (and Not-So-Wild) Places how they’re totally edi­ble and are nick­named “Cossack’s aspara­gus.” The next trim­mings will be going into the skillet.

scirpus-californicus

A new native to the pond is Cal­i­for­nia bul­rush (Scir­pus cal­i­for­ni­cus), a replace­ment for a giant papyrus that finally suc­cumbed after two decades. Although the new scir­pus is called a rush, it’s actu­ally a sedge. Two months ago it was a one-gallon plant. Now it’s eas­ily twice the size.

scirpus-californicus-blooming

Its lit­tle flow­ers aren’t spec­tac­u­lar, but a mass of these lit­tle bloom clus­ters could be a nice effect once it gets a lit­tle larger.

The clos­est canyon is about an eighth of a mile away, but var­i­ous crit­ters find their way to the water. Rac­coons, opos­sums and tracks from a cat larger than a house cat, smaller than a cougar have been sighted over the years. Dur­ing the first years a cou­ple of vis­its from a great blue heron finally dis­cour­aged John from try­ing to raise koi in the lower pond after they ended turn­ing in expen­sive birdfeed.

sparrows

These days the main vis­i­tors are spar­rows, which blend so well with pond scum and the sur­round­ing rocks that they’re hard to see…

lesser-goldfinches

…and these days we’re see­ing a lot of these lesser goldfinches.

Now that our day­time tem­per­a­tures have finally been climb­ing into what you’d expect dur­ing the sum­mer, I think I might be frol­ick­ing in the water if I were one of these birds.

July 21 2009 05:48 am | Categories: gardeningmy garden | Tags:

6 Responses to “in the pond”

  1. Town Mouse on 21 Jul 2009 at 7:47 am #

    Oh, I’m envi­ous! I would so love a big pond with frogs and drag­on­flies… Do you have drag­on­flies? I’ll be curi­ous how the culi­nary exper­i­ment turns out…

  2. susan morrison (garden-chick) on 21 Jul 2009 at 9:59 am #

    Love look­ing at the happy birds. A good rea­son to have a pond, even in water starved times.

  3. laurence fosgate on 21 Jul 2009 at 4:01 pm #

    We have pond build­ing as one of our favorite activ­i­ties. Am curi­ous what kind of pump you have, fil­tra­tion and more. We put feeder gold­fish and very inex­pen­sive koi in ours, use lots of float­ing and sub­merged water plants (which fur­nish vir­tu­ally all the food they need) cre­ate lots of hid­ing places and place items strate­gi­cal­lly to dis­cour­age cranes rest­ing near edge. Then we let nature do the rest. So far, though the cranes eat some, the fish pop­u­la­tion is self sus­tain­ing. The first time I saw a crane near the fish, I tried to scare it off. The next time i saw him, I thought, you’re the most beau­ti­ful thing in my gar­den, how could I be against you? Ever since, I look at the pond and don’t worry about the birds. I just decided to paint them into the pic­ture. Good Evening, Ed Fos­gate in Orlando

  4. lostlandscape on 21 Jul 2009 at 8:19 pm #

    Town Mouse, yes as far as drag­on­flies, but no for frogs. I guess the frogs have it fig­ure out that it’s not a nat­ural water fea­ture and haven’t quite fig­ured out how to bur­row in the con­crete banks or some­thing like that…

    Susan, it’s worth it for the bird­watch­ing alone. Our water restric­tions ban foun­tains but not ponds, and we’d have to be in a stage 4 state where they say we can’t have water fea­tures of any sort. (We’re in stage 2 right now.)

    Ed, ponds are great and I love the sound of water. W have a pretty pow­er­ful pump (some­thing around 40 watts or more) attached to a bio­log­i­cal fil­ter full of grad­u­ated sizes of stones and gravel. The water stays pretty clear. We’ve also built high patio cov­ers over the water so that the larger pond is in shade 80% of the day. That keeps the algae down but is enough light for the lilies to bloom. I think we’ve rec­on­ciled our­selves to los­ing fish to the occa­sional bird–the pop­u­la­tion now is mainly feeder gold­fish that have been spared being fed to larger fish. To dis­cour­age the mam­mals, we keep pot­ted plants all around the pond edge. It’s not a great look, but it dis­cour­ages rac­coons that don’t want to deal with hav­ing a hard time climb­ing their way back out of the water. It works most of the time.

  5. tina on 22 Jul 2009 at 5:02 am #

    Frol­ick­ing in the water is a great past time for us all in the sum­mer. The pond looks refreshing.

  6. Brad B on 22 Jul 2009 at 2:19 pm #

    Ponds are always great. A friend’s pond has a pel­i­can that vis­its to get the fish. I was shocked watch­ing it on her roof star­ing into the pond. She had decided to give up on the fish because net­ting and other things just looked too ugly.
    I also want to know how the Cossack’s aspara­gus turns out.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply