destroying smuggler’s gulch

Smugglers Gulch and Tijuana River Valley

I’m stand­ing in the United States as I take this pic­ture. The hills you see are less than a mile to the south but are mostly in Mex­ico, across the bor­der. The low break in the hills car­ries the name Smuggler’s Gulch.

The mouth of said gulch has been part of one of the more con­tro­ver­sial ter­raform­ing projects in progress as we speak, the demon­stra­tion of enhanced fenc­ing tech­niques that is the US-Mexico bor­der fence. Ironic/pathetic isn’t it, that not that many weeks ago the news was buzzing with the twen­ti­eth anniver­sary of the fall of the Berlin wall, but here in many of our back yards new walls are going up? I’ll leave dis­cus­sion of the ethics and human costs of the fence-building mind­set to orga­ni­za­tions like Amnesty Inter­na­tional or even the Catholic Church, but the project’s costs to stuff like nature are pretty steep as well.

Left: This photo by April Reese from a Jan­u­ary Land Let­ter shows much bet­ter than my photo just some of the earth mov­ing that went into block­ing off this canyon. [ Source ]

When peo­ple hear that the Depart­ment of Home­land Secu­rity is build­ing a fence they might say, oh that’s nice, what harm can a lit­tle 15 foot tall fence do? Well, place your nice lit­tle 15 foot fence on top of 35,000 truck­loads of fill dirt essen­tially form­ing an earthen dam designed to con­tain humans instead of water. Humans have more cog­ni­tive abil­ity than water mol­e­cules, so what might con­tain water will just send the humans to the next avail­able cross­ing point.

The rich coastal chap­ar­ral that was here has been bull­dozed and buried. Hay wat­tles with some hydroseeded low-growing plants will be expect to take care of ero­sion con­trol. Down-slope, the sen­si­tive habi­tat of the Tijuana River National Estu­ar­ine Research Reserve waits to see what’s going to hap­pen once the rains begin.

December 04 2009 06:36 am | Categories: landscapeplaces | Tags:

10 Responses to “destroying smuggler’s gulch”

  1. Town Mouse on 04 Dec 2009 at 7:48 pm #

    That is soooo stu­pid. Of course, right along with that are the peo­ple who made a huge (100 ft) peace sign in the hills around here — out of Pam­pas Grass!!!

    On days like that, I have to work in the gar­den for a few hours, and then I calm down and feel better.

  2. ryan on 05 Dec 2009 at 6:20 pm #

    Arg. On my ‘top ten most frus­trat­ing things our gov­ern­ment is doing’ list. And I didn’t know they were doing it quite like this.

  3. GrokSurf on 06 Dec 2009 at 5:47 pm #

    Good tim­ing for this post Jim. From what I’ve read, the feds exempted them­selves from envi­ron­men­tal regs and didn’t prop­erly estab­lish ground­cover on the dirt dam. As you noted, it wasn’t designed as a water stor­age dam so when heavy rains and flood­ing come there’s a good pos­si­bil­ity of dam­age from water and debris back­ing up, seep­age, and slope erosion.

  4. susan morrison (garden-chick) on 06 Dec 2009 at 7:09 pm #

    Some­times I feel like the more I know, the more I wish I didn’t know it. I’m sur­prised at how often gov­ern­ments at all lev­els make ill-informed deci­sions that frankly aren’t rocket sci­ence. There are plenty of peo­ple who could have pro­vided the input on this project to avoid a lot of the neg­a­tive impacts you’re describing.

  5. GrokSurf on 07 Dec 2009 at 3:58 pm #

    Sure enough, the rains just started and Smuggler’s Gulch fense is already in the news:

    http://www.kpbs.org/news/2009/dec/07/tijuana-river-valley-residents-say-border-fence-co/

  6. GrokSurf on 07 Dec 2009 at 3:59 pm #

    Oops…make that “fence.”

  7. GrokSurf on 07 Dec 2009 at 4:16 pm #

    Also, back in Octo­ber, Rob Davis from Voice of San Diego wrote about the dis­as­ter wait­ing to happen:

    http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/environment/article_13330282-1245-5e49-bd68-5a10237c9f44.html

  8. [ Lost in the Landscape ] » world’s thorniest rose? on 08 Jan 2010 at 9:50 am #

    […] by the Cor­nell Lab of Ornithol­ogy shows. (I also did a brief post related to all this recently, on the destruc­tion of Smuggler’s Gulch.) When the only know U.S. pop­u­la­tion of this plant is fur­ther iso­lated from its south­ern kin, it […]

  9. badthings on 05 Feb 2010 at 11:09 am #

    And check out what they’re doing to the Tohono O’odham:
    http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/article.php?id=204

  10. Richard on 15 Feb 2010 at 9:07 am #

    Stop being dra­matic. You do under­stand that this is called smug­glers gulch not as much for the human traf­fic as for the drug traf­fic? And while you might say they’ll find another way in, doing noth­ing is like leav­ing the door not only unlocked but open to your house. This is at least clos­ing the door, and turn­ing off the big neon sign.

    Also I’m sad they didn’t con­sult with you on all their projects so I have to hear your com­plaints on some web­site (peo­ple who com­mented above), but I have a feel­ing they didn’t just out­lay that much money so they could watch it erode at the first rain.…oh wait they didn’t. I know you want to believe the gov­ern­ment is just like Veruca Salt, but they do take a lit­tle more care in plan­ning than you think.

    also this:
    http://voiceofsandiego.org/environment/article_49684726-19d2-11df-ba69-001cc4c002e0.html

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply