world’s thorniest rose?

I grew this fiercely thorny rose, Rosa minu­ti­fo­lia, for over a decade. With wild-rose-pink flow­ers barely two inches across, its petals were crin­kled and del­i­cate, but the blooms were never par­tic­u­larly stun­ning when com­pared to the buxom, botoxed blooms of typ­i­cal gar­den roses. The leaves were tiny to the point of almost being non-existent, and I’ve already men­tioned the incred­i­ble num­ber of thorns that made this just about the prick­li­est thing I’ve ever dealt with. (The only sim­i­larly thorny roses I can think of are a few heir­loom moss roses like Alfred de Dal­mas that I grew in my early teen rose-growing years.) So spiny is it that one of its early col­lec­tors pro­posed an alter­nate name for it: Rosa hor­rida. (Check out the fas­ci­nat­ing tale of its dis­cov­ery by Bar­bara Ert­ter here.)

In the end, I think I grew it partly because of its weirdly cool thorni­ness and its inter­est­ing story, but also because of its arti­fi­cial, polit­i­cal rar­ity. In the United States, this rose is found only as a small island pop­u­la­tion along the Mex­i­can bor­der on Otay Mesa, here in San Diego County. This extreme rar­ity has placed it on California’s endan­gered species list. Skip south into Mex­ico a few dozen miles, how­ever, and the plant begins to become a fairly com­mon mem­ber of the chap­ar­ral plant com­mu­nity, form­ing great mounded thick­ets three to four feet high and many feet across. The notion that the plant is par­tic­u­larly rare is an arti­fact of national bound­aries. Erase the US-Mexico bor­der, and Rosa minu­ti­fo­lia becomes a main­stay of part of the pan-Californian ecosystem.

I find that to be a weird lit­tle men­tal game: Is the plant rare or not? What odd things do polit­i­cal bound­aries do to how we under­stand the nat­ural world that those bound­aries are drawn over? Does that mean that it’s crazy to call this an endan­gered plant?

To that last ques­tion, I’ll answer that we really should con­sider it a plant to pro­tect. We need to pre­serve what’s left of the diver­sity that remains in the world. If the plant goes extinct in Cal­i­for­nia, it’s gone from Cal­i­for­nia. Never mind that it has cousins south of the border.

Bor­der­lands, Con­ti­nen­tal Divide pro­duced by The Cor­nell Lab of Ornithol­ogy from iLCP on Vimeo.

And these days the purely con­cep­tual notion of a national bor­der is turn­ing into a phys­i­cal real­ity, as the ginor­mous bor­der fence project turns the United States into a freak­ish zoo exhibit behind bars as this video pro­duced by the Cor­nell Lab of Ornithol­ogy shows. (I also did a brief post related to all this recently, on the destruc­tion of Smuggler’s Gulch.) When the only know U.S. pop­u­la­tion of this plant is fur­ther iso­lated from its south­ern kin, it becomes all the more des­per­ate to pre­serve what lit­tle we have left.

When we were prepar­ing the back yard for a small room addi­tion we needed to move a few plants out of the way. My Rosa minu­ti­fo­lia was one of them. Used to near-desert con­di­tions, the plant shoots down roots far into the ground, maybe even 20 feet deep. I guess I didn’t get enough of the roots, not to men­tion the fact that the trans­plant took place in the high heat of sum­mer. The plant declined and then died over the course of a cou­ple months.

I see the plant here and there. A native plant sale might have a few plants. The Tree of Life Nurs­ery stocks it. Botan­i­cal gar­dens some­times have a lit­tle thicket of it (or a mas­sive thicket of it as is the case at Ran­cho Santa Ana Botan­i­cal Gar­den where “five rooted cut­tings planted…in 1954 had become ‘one large tan­gled mass’ nearly 30 feet across by 1982″ [ source ]). All these pho­tos are from the Huntington’s Desert Gar­den, where the rose grows along­side cac­tus and other things that make its spini­ness look right at home.

I get nos­tal­gic when­ever I see it. My lit­tle plant, which was set in awful, dense, dry soil in a much too shady spot, never grew or flow­ered much. Nip­ping at the dead branches kept it from form­ing a Rosa hor­rida thicket. But I con­tin­ued to cod­dle it for what­ever rea­sons any of us cod­dle inter­est­ing, under-performing plants. And one of these days I wouldn’t be sur­prised if I plant another lit­tle thicket of it.

January 08 2010 09:50 am | Categories: gardeningmy gardenplacesplant profiles | Tags:

6 Responses to “world’s thorniest rose?”

  1. tina on 08 Jan 2010 at 10:28 am #

    What a shame to have lost a spe­cial plant. That thorni­ness is cool but I wouldn’t want to gar­den near it.

  2. Brent on 08 Jan 2010 at 10:53 am #

    Thanks for the great information!

  3. Frances on 08 Jan 2010 at 11:00 am #

    What an inter­est­ing story, James. At first I was going to say that human bound­aries have no mean­ing to the plants, but you make a con­vinc­ing argu­ment oth­er­wise. We have a rose here, nick­named Thorny, a rugosa, Groo­ten­dorst Supreme, even the leaves and roots have thorns.
    Frances

  4. Greg on 09 Jan 2010 at 10:57 am #

    I knew one of those old moss roses for a while, with their dan­ger­ous thorns. The cau­tion needed to move them may be why I didn’t bring a trans­plant of them along with me when I moved here, but I surely miss those lovely blossoms.

    Showy and big as they were, though, I bet the tiny flow­ers of your rosa hor­rida are quite valu­able in your envi­ron­ment, at least through the eyes of the species great and small who depend on them.

    Thanks for shar­ing the video about the Wall and the dev­as­ta­tion its caus­ing. It’s not a story we hear enough about, so I’m grate­ful for your return­ing to the sub­ject to keep it fresh in our minds.

  5. Nancy Andreasen on 09 Jan 2010 at 2:47 pm #

    We found thick­ets of this rose in the Baja back­coun­try, and I brought home hips, which the local arbore­tum sowed. I grew it for years, but it didn’t like my con­di­tions and never did any­thing but look piteous. It was inter­est­ing to see it in Baja — in July it was in total dor­mancy, appar­ently due to the extreme heat.

  6. lostlandscape on 10 Jan 2010 at 8:02 pm #

    Tina, gar­den­ing around the rose was def­i­nitely an issue. For­tu­nately the weeds seemed to stay away as much as I did.

    Frances, the plant of Groo­ten­dorst Supreme looks pretty seri­ous. Def­i­nitely a plant to treat with respect. As far as human-made bor­ders, some plants seem to have no prob­lem ignor­ing them–take my neighbor’s Alger­ian ivy for instance (please!)

    Greg, when I trans­planted a rose from my old gar­den the moss roses weren’t at the top of my list either. Over the hol­i­days I was reminded how miss­ing a plant from the ecosys­tem might be prob­lem­atic: I don’t eat meat, but one meal every dish on the table (even the veg­gies) was car­niv­o­rous; I could see a local insect rely­ing on this one plant and hav­ing noth­ing to take its place. (My solu­tion was to hold out for cook­ies, but I’m not sure what the insect would do…)

    Nancy, it’s neat that you saw this plant in the wilds. From your descrip­tion it sounds even less like a plant most gar­den­ers would want to include in the land­scapes. My plant took a LONG TIME to begin to look okay. Maybe it was work­ing on its killer root system.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply