a local ceanothus

Cean­othus sea­son is here in force. One of the local stars is a species with the unfor­tu­nate com­mon name of “warty-stem cean­othus.” Nei­ther is its Latin name of Cean­othus ver­ru­co­sus espe­cially glam­orous. But hope­fully you can see how cool a plant it is in these photos.

If my week­day desk had a win­dow I’d look out on a the head of a lit­tle canyon that’s a mix­ture of intro­duced euca­lyp­tus and a par­tially restored snip­pet of coastal sage scrub habi­tat. A cou­ple hun­dred yards away in the re-wilded area are sev­eral of these cean­othus that have been glow­ing white for the last month with their clouds of flowers.

Last Novem­ber these cean­othus were stemmy but gracefully-branched shrubs. Adapted to sur­vival for many months with­out water its leaves are tiny and sparse. Still you could eas­ily walk past them.

If you stopped to look at the plant, you’d eas­ily see these inter­est­ing “warts” that give the plant its name. The warts are actu­ally leaf-bases (stip­ules) that remain on the branches long after the leaves are gone.

By Jan­u­ary the for­merly sparse look­ing plants were respond­ing to the rains with swelling flower buds.

And a month later the plants were going at it big time…

Cal­i­for­nia could be the evo­lu­tion­ary epi­cen­ter of the genus cean­othus. Of the approx­i­mately 52 cean­othus species in the US, 46 are found here. Of those 46 about 38 occur only here.

That’s a lot of com­pe­ti­tion for pre­cious space and water in a nurs­ery, but sev­eral native Cal­i­for­nia spe­cial­ists in south­ern Cal­i­for­nia offer this plant. You can see that this could be a choice addi­tion to a dry gar­den where you want an airy, grace­ful shrub that’s 7–8 feet tall and about 10 feet across. As I strug­gle with cean­othus from out­side my imme­di­ate area, I keep think­ing I should use more selec­tions that are bet­ter suited to what I have to offer them.

I love this plant, warts and all. But peo­ple in the end seem to buy the name and the image as much as they buy the plant. Just rebrand the plant with a friend­lier (but more trite) hor­ti­cul­tural name like “Cloud Blos­som Lilac” and just stand back as every­one snaps it up.

March 07 2010 07:30 am | Categories: plant profiles | Tags:

7 Responses to “a local ceanothus”

  1. George on 07 Mar 2010 at 7:57 am #

    Ah, memories…I used to com­mand one of those rare fortress port­holes with a view when I worked at the library (and you were pretty close too) but I never got out to exam­ine the indi­vid­ual plants close up. Last time I vis­ited, though, the restora­tion on the north side looked to be com­ing along nicely. The rab­bits sure were plen­ti­ful! Thanks for the closer look.

  2. Town Mouse on 07 Mar 2010 at 7:47 pm #

    Beau­ti­ful! And I bet it’s hum­ming with bees this time of year. Yes, that would be a nice addi­tion to the garden…

  3. Lynn on 07 Mar 2010 at 7:53 pm #

    like chang­ing grey-green to “seafoam” in the J. Crew cat­a­logs, it’s all in the spin. Looks like a great plant, and the flower reminds me of Buddleia.

  4. Christine on 08 Mar 2010 at 8:24 pm #

    Per­haps we could start a cam­paign sim­i­lar to the pork one? Cean­othus, the other drought tol­er­ant shrub.

  5. Karyl on 09 Mar 2010 at 4:46 am #

    It’s a beauty. Looks like it would be a very bee friendly plant as well mak­ing it even more attractive.

  6. Pomona Belvedere on 12 Mar 2010 at 10:12 am #

    It’s so inter­est­ing to see the dif­fer­ences between C. ver­ru­co­sus (reminds me of Char­lie and the Choco­late Fac­tory: Veruca Salt I believe was the charm­ing name of one of the chil­dren tour­ing the fac­tory) and some of my own local ceanothus.

    Those 52 or so species really are approx­i­mate, I’m impressed at any firmly-identified cean­othus. Some of the ones here are clearly a cer­tain species, but many are ambigu­ous. I was try­ing to i.d. one of them with the aid of a chart in a wild­flower book. Some­one who was more expe­ri­enced than I peered over just when I was read­ing the part about how they hybridize like crazy in the wild and said, “There are a lot more kinds than they could ever put in that chart. And peo­ple keep argu­ing over whether they are a sub­species or just a variant.”

  7. Steve on 13 Mar 2010 at 4:47 am #

    Count me in as a Cean­othus fan as well. I planted many in Port­land, Ore­gon and Reno, Nevada and, for the most part, they did well. My vari­eties tended to the blue, sim­ply because it is such a rare gar­den color. Sue me — I like color. They are get­ting more cachet, actu­ally, else­where, as their har­di­ness becomes increas­ingly obvi­ous. Believe it or not, it is a rather new plant to many in those climes.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply