screening with wood, screening with plants

front-screent-from-walkway

I showed the almost-complete ver­sion of this front porch screen ear­lier, but that was before we applied the final stain to the wood. Here it is in the really final version.

deck-railing-corner-showing-stained-and-faded-posts

deck-railing-stained-and-faded

As long as we were stain­ing wood, we got up to the deck and attacked the rail­ings with the same stain. It had been more than a year since we’d done it last and things had faded. You can see the before and after pretty clearly in these pic­tures. (This project used an oil-based stain for hard­woods. They make a water-based stain that claims to last seven years, but it ended up flak­ing off this oily ipe hard­wood on the small project we tested it on. Total dis­as­ter. Save it for softwoods.)

How do all of you react to exte­rior wood that’s aged to a sil­ver color? This project is still on the new side for us and we wanted to keep it look­ing as it did when we first fin­ished it. Stain­ing all the tops and bot­toms and sides of the wood is a lot of work, though. As we get less able or moti­vated to keep up with details around the house, I’m sure we’ll let things assume more of a Gray Gar­dens look.

front-screen-with-new-ceanothus

But back to the front screen… After the project was com­plete there was a gap between where the screen ends and the dri­ve­way. While I’m not one to put up cas­tle walls and a moat between us and the busy street, a lit­tle more pri­vacy seemed like a good idea.

Before, we had a cou­ple low laven­ders in front of the screen: Nice enough and they sur­vived with vir­tu­ally no sum­mer water­ing. But they weren’t much of a pri­vacy screen. Yank. Out they went.

ceanothus-tuxedo1

In their place is this new Cean­othus ‘Tuxedo.’ I’d done a post on some gar­den cean­othus not long ago, and I couldn’t stop think­ing about the near-black foliage of this vari­ety. With the laven­ders gone, there was a per­fect place for it.

Okay, stare at the pic­ture of the lit­tle gal­lon plant and ask the obvi­ous ques­tion: “Wasn’t the idea to install a plant that would screen the view from the street?”

Cean­othus tend to be rapid grow­ers. This selec­tion is new to the trade this spring, so I’m not sure exactly how rapid it’ll be. Still, I expect that it’ll approach its tar­get size of six feet by six feet before too long. I’ll post more pic­tures as it fills in.

May 30 2009 | Categories: gardeninglandscape designmy garden | Tags: | 13 Comments »

some garden ceanothus

ceanothus-tuxedo

On my last nurs­ery trip I noticed a new hor­ti­cul­tural cean­othus selec­tion that I hadn’t encoun­tered before. Cean­othus Tuxedo is strik­ing because of its brown-black foliage, a leaf color I’ve never seen before on a cean­othus. In this photo you can see its large, dark foliage con­trasted against the bright medium green of a more typ­i­cal ceanothus.

Tuxedo arose as a muta­tion on a branch of Cean­othus Autum­nal Blue, a hybrid of C. thyr­si­florus and C. ×delil­ianus (which is itself a hybrid of a hardy decid­u­ous species with a more ten­der ever­green one). Autum­nal Blue isn’t a plant that’s a typ­i­cal con­stituent of Cal­i­for­nia native gar­dens, instead being an old British hybrid that was bred for its har­di­ness. Also unlike its purely Cal­i­for­nia brethren, it blooms in sum­mer or fall, not in the spring.

The new Tuxedo selec­tion is reput­edly drought-tolerant. Look­ing at its ances­try, how­ever, it’s clear it will require some sup­ple­men­tal sum­mer water in dry cli­mates. There’s no ques­tion that it appre­ci­ates good drainage. Mature height is listed as at least six feet high and across.

ceanothus-thyrsiflorus-el-dorado

Next to Tuxedo in the nurs­ery were a cou­ple var­ie­gated cean­othus. C. thyr­si­florus ‘El Dorado’ fea­tures small light green/dark green leaves on a large shrub. In sum­mer the leaves will show more con­trast, with the light green turn­ing more of a yel­low color.

ceanothus-griseus-horizontalis-diamond-heights

If you want yellow-and-green leaves in a more spread­ing cean­othus, there’s C. griseus hor­i­zon­talis ‘Dia­mond Heights.’ (Sorry for the fuzzy photo…) You could think of it as a var­ie­gated ver­sion of a well known ground­cover cean­othus like ‘Yan­kee Point.’

Both of the above could be con­sid­ered low-water (not no-water) plants for a garden.

Cal­i­for­nia native plant purists might think twice before plant­ing any of these selec­tions. They scream that they’re gar­den plants and not vis­i­tors from the wilds. But these cean­othus do give you more options if you’d still like your plants to have a bit of laid back Cal­i­for­nia atti­tude to them.

ceanothus-leucodermis-flowers-and-stems

ceanothus-leucodermis-stems

The last cean­othus I want to share is a wild plant, taken about ten days ago just out­side the Santa Ysabel Open Space Pre­serve in the San Diego County foothills. Chap­ar­ral whitethorn (C. leu­co­der­mis) has got to be one of the most unique of the genus, com­bin­ing fluffy, vaporous blue-tinged white flow­ers with a plant that has bark as white as an aspen. It’s an amaz­ing effect.

But unfor­tu­nately the plant appears to be sin­gu­larly dif­fi­cult to grow in any­thing but the per­fect gar­den spot. Tak­ing up the slack is a garden-friendly hybrid, L.T. Blue (L.T. equals leu­co­der­mis x thyr­si­florus), which pre­serves the white bark color and blue (if not misty blue) flow­ers of leu­co­der­mis in com­bi­na­tion with the much more garden-tolerant C. thyr­si­florus. Las Pil­i­tas car­ries it, and this last photo is from their site.


May 04 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 10 Comments »