…and some not so garden-worthy

You could prob­a­bly gather together six gar­den­ers and get six dif­fer­ent opin­ions of what would make a plant garden-worthy. But I sus­pect there might be some­what more agree­ment on cer­tain other plants that prob­a­bly shouldn’t be included in a gar­den. Here are some encoun­ters from Sunday’s trip to Tecolote Canyon that would fall eas­ily into most people’s less-than-desirable category.

tecolote-canyon-poison-oak

I’ll have to admit to actu­ally lik­ing this plant to the right. Dur­ing the win­ter it drops its leaves and is an attrac­tive thicket of upright or sprawl­ing branches. This time of year it starts new growth that has this warm red-brown col­oration. It’ll flower soon, and then set some loose clus­ters of white berries. Pretty, yes, and native, and impor­tant to wildlife. But this is poi­son oak. Maybe not the best choice for small back­yard gardens…

Most of the rest of my list below is com­prised of exotic plants that have staked a claim for them­selves at the expense of the native species. Dif­fer­ent loca­tions have their own list of inva­sives, so what you see below is tai­lored to South­ern Cal­i­for­nia. Some of these plants could be good choices for other loca­tions. Oth­ers would be trou­ble almost any­where you grow them.

[ At this point I’d like to ded­i­cate the rest of this Fri­day the thir­teenth post to Out­of­doors, who last month devoted her Fri­day the thir­teenth post to inva­sive plant species. ]

tecolote-canyon-pampas-and-iceplant

tecolote-canyon-fountain-grass

I won’t go into too much detail about this trou­ble­some trio. Peo­ple have been work­ing hard to get the word out on pam­pas grass, green foun­tain grass, and ice­plant. The grasses, in par­tic­u­lar, can be gor­geous things in gar­dens, wav­ing in the breeze and lend­ing their dra­matic form to groups of softly mound­ing land­scape shrubs. You can see why peo­ple want to grow them. But are they garden-worthy in South­ern California?

All three of these quickly check out of people’s gar­dens and make for the wilds. I found both grasses and plenty of ice­plant escaped into the canyon, here on this hill­side and in other spots. So, as pretty as they can be–and I con­sider this drift of foun­tain grass in the sec­ond photo to be par­tic­u­larly poetic–these three would be bet­ter left in their native lands, or grown in cli­mates where the weather might limit their spread.

tecolote-canyon-wild-onion-flower

tecolote-canyon-wild-onion-plants

This is the first flower I saw this sea­son on the local plants of onion weed (Aspho­delus fis­tu­lo­sus). The first time I saw it I thought it was a wild­flower and wanted some for my gar­den. In full bloom the stalks of white flow­ers are an impres­sive sight. But they do spread like crazy. Not a good choice for the garden.

tecolote-canyon-teasel-and-mustard

This com­bi­na­tion of plants looks as impres­sive as any plant­ing assem­bled by prac­ti­tion­ers of the New Peren­ni­als gar­den move­ment. But once again, the plants aren’t really wel­come addi­tions to the canyon. In the fore­ground is teasel (Dip­sacus sp.), a plant with excel­lent year-round archi­tec­tural struc­ture but hav­ing inva­sive ten­den­cies that are con­sid­ered “Mod­er­ate” by the Cal­i­for­nia Inva­sive Plant Coun­cil (Cal-IPC). Here it’s set against a back­ground of last season’s black mus­tard, a prob­lem in these parts since it was intro­duced by the Span­ish in the eigh­teenth cen­tury. The Cal-IPC only con­sid­ers the mustard’s rangi­ness to be of “Mod­er­ate” con­cern, but also states: “Pri­mar­ily a weed of dis­turbed sites, but can be locally a more sig­nif­i­cant prob­lem in wild­lands.” I’d say it’s a more sig­nif­i­cant pest locally.

tecolote-canyon-fennel

Fen­nel can be attrac­tive in the herb gar­den, but like the rest of the inva­sives in this post, this is another plant that gets around. Its over­all unde­sir­able impacts are con­sid­ered “High” by the Cal-IPC. If I see fen­nel offered in the local nurs­eries it’s usu­ally the bronze col­ored strain. It’s less vig­or­ous, but all forms are con­sid­ered inva­sive. I do wish this were a bet­ter choice for gar­dens because it hosts swal­low­tail but­ter­flies, but at least there’s plenty of swal­low­tail food out in the local canyons. The but­ter­flies won’t starve. Okay, I’ll pass.

tecolote-canyon-pepper-tree

Say “Old Cal­i­for­nia” to any­one who’s lived in these parts for long, and this plant will prob­a­bly come to mind. The Brazil­ian Peru­vian pep­per tree forms a gor­geous tree with long, del­i­cate leaves that move any time there’s a breeze. But unfor­tu­nately the plants develop berries that the birds find irre­sistible. While the Cal-IPC con­sid­ers their threat to Cal­i­for­nia to be only “Lim­ited,” there are plants that would be bet­ter choices.

The Aus­tralian pep­per­mint wil­low (Ago­nis flex­u­osa), although not a native plant, is a good drought-tolerant sub­sti­tute that looks a bit like the pep­per tree but doesn’t share its inva­sive ten­den­cies. If you must have a del­i­cate weep­ing tree that says “Old Cal­i­for­nia” but don’t mind a lilt­ing Aus­tralian accent, this would be a bet­ter choice–and you can get vari­eties with either green or dra­matic black foliage. Or you could give up alto­gether on the colo­nial look and go in for any of the truly native trees. It doesn’t get any more “old Cal­i­for­nia” than that.

As I reread this post I’m struck that I’m prob­a­bly not doing a par­tic­u­larly good job of dis­cour­ag­ing peo­ple from grow­ing these plants. I keep going back to the beau­ti­ful redeem­ing qual­i­ties of these inva­sives, and I guess that’s why they con­tinue to be such a prob­lem. The mind tells you they might be bad news, but some­times it’s hard to say no.

With this last image I leave the plant king­dom and turn to another species that’s native to the local canyons. This one I think you’ll def­i­nitely agree you wouldn’t want around. I won’t assume that you like snakes any more than I do, so if you want to see the pic­ture you’ll have to click HERE.

Still, who among you doesn’t think baby ani­mals are just the cutest things? Now, every­body, say “awwwww”… This is a lit­tle baby south­ern Pacific rat­tler, prob­a­bly no longer than my fore­arm and too young to rat­tle. I’m deathly afraid of snakes but man­aged to fend off the fear to snap the pic­ture and watch the snake as it coiled itself defen­sively and make like a sidewinder, slid­ing back­wards into the grasses.

I have to respect these ani­mals since they do won­ders to keep down the rodent pop­u­la­tion. And they’re every bit as native as the poi­son oak I showed ear­lier. But after hav­ing had one of these in the back­yard fac­ing off against my cat, I’ve def­i­nitely decided this is another species that’s not garden-worthy, at least in my enclosed lit­tle space.

I admit it, I’m a wimp. Nature isn’t always con­ve­nient is it? But throw out the rat­tlesnakes and pam­pas grass and black mus­tard and fen­nels and you’re still left tens of thou­sands of cool and friendly selec­tions to invite into the garden.

March 13 2009 | Categories: gardeninglandscapelandscape designplacesplant profiles | Tags: | 4 Comments »

odds and ends

Most of the time I have to devote to cre­ative things like pho­tog­ra­phy or blog­ging is Fri­day, Sat­ur­day and Sun­day so I can be a lit­tle slow catch­ing up to what’s hap­pened dur­ing the week. Here are a few of the dishes I have stand­ing in the sink:

Flowering teasel

Flow­er­ing teasel

Greg was won­der­ing about a plant I’d gener­i­cally called a this­tle ear­lier, and how it looked unlike what he was call­ing a this­tle in his own gar­den. Thanks to a chain of weird coin­ci­dences of the sort that some might inter­preted as mirac­u­lous enough to have founded a mod­ern reli­gion, I learned that my this­tle is actu­ally Dip­sacus ful­lonum, a teasel. Both are in the asterid group of plants and unple­santly spiny, but this is a dis­tant relative.

Fun facts about teasel (from Wikipedia):

  • The indi­vid­ual flo­rets that make up this larger flow­er­ing head start bloom­ing about half-way up, then move both up and down, as you see in this picture.
  • The dried flow­ers were used to comb impu­ri­ties out of wool.


Brillante Weblog Premio 2008

Bril­lante Weblog Pre­mio 2008

Thanks to Greg (again!) this blog has been awarded the pres­ti­gious 2008 Bril­lante Award. If I don’t end up hav­ing to hock it to pay for fuel for my Lear jet, you’ll see it on my side panel at some point in the future.


One of my recent posts had a quote that within it held another quote, one by Michael Pol­lan, author of The Botany of Desire, The Omnivore’s Dilemma and a few other vol­umes. Mary Ann had a post with a link to a video of him pre­sent­ing some of his ideas. He’s an engag­ing speaker and has things to say. I worry that some of them work towards val­i­dat­ing a human-centric world view that I try not to hold, but he’ll get you think­ing.

August 02 2008 | Categories: plant profilesrambles | Tags: | 2 Comments »