some garden ceanothus

ceanothus-tuxedo

On my last nurs­ery trip I noticed a new hor­ti­cul­tural cean­othus selec­tion that I hadn’t encoun­tered before. Cean­othus Tuxedo is strik­ing because of its brown-black foliage, a leaf color I’ve never seen before on a cean­othus. In this photo you can see its large, dark foliage con­trasted against the bright medium green of a more typ­i­cal ceanothus.

Tuxedo arose as a muta­tion on a branch of Cean­othus Autum­nal Blue, a hybrid of C. thyr­si­florus and C. ×delil­ianus (which is itself a hybrid of a hardy decid­u­ous species with a more ten­der ever­green one). Autum­nal Blue isn’t a plant that’s a typ­i­cal con­stituent of Cal­i­for­nia native gar­dens, instead being an old British hybrid that was bred for its har­di­ness. Also unlike its purely Cal­i­for­nia brethren, it blooms in sum­mer or fall, not in the spring.

The new Tuxedo selec­tion is reput­edly drought-tolerant. Look­ing at its ances­try, how­ever, it’s clear it will require some sup­ple­men­tal sum­mer water in dry cli­mates. There’s no ques­tion that it appre­ci­ates good drainage. Mature height is listed as at least six feet high and across.

ceanothus-thyrsiflorus-el-dorado

Next to Tuxedo in the nurs­ery were a cou­ple var­ie­gated cean­othus. C. thyr­si­florus ‘El Dorado’ fea­tures small light green/dark green leaves on a large shrub. In sum­mer the leaves will show more con­trast, with the light green turn­ing more of a yel­low color.

ceanothus-griseus-horizontalis-diamond-heights

If you want yellow-and-green leaves in a more spread­ing cean­othus, there’s C. griseus hor­i­zon­talis ‘Dia­mond Heights.’ (Sorry for the fuzzy photo…) You could think of it as a var­ie­gated ver­sion of a well known ground­cover cean­othus like ‘Yan­kee Point.’

Both of the above could be con­sid­ered low-water (not no-water) plants for a garden.

Cal­i­for­nia native plant purists might think twice before plant­ing any of these selec­tions. They scream that they’re gar­den plants and not vis­i­tors from the wilds. But these cean­othus do give you more options if you’d still like your plants to have a bit of laid back Cal­i­for­nia atti­tude to them.

ceanothus-leucodermis-flowers-and-stems

ceanothus-leucodermis-stems

The last cean­othus I want to share is a wild plant, taken about ten days ago just out­side the Santa Ysabel Open Space Pre­serve in the San Diego County foothills. Chap­ar­ral whitethorn (C. leu­co­der­mis) has got to be one of the most unique of the genus, com­bin­ing fluffy, vaporous blue-tinged white flow­ers with a plant that has bark as white as an aspen. It’s an amaz­ing effect.

But unfor­tu­nately the plant appears to be sin­gu­larly dif­fi­cult to grow in any­thing but the per­fect gar­den spot. Tak­ing up the slack is a garden-friendly hybrid, L.T. Blue (L.T. equals leu­co­der­mis x thyr­si­florus), which pre­serves the white bark color and blue (if not misty blue) flow­ers of leu­co­der­mis in com­bi­na­tion with the much more garden-tolerant C. thyr­si­florus. Las Pil­i­tas car­ries it, and this last photo is from their site.


May 04 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 10 Comments »

milkvetch update

astragalus-nuttallii-late-season

I wrote ear­lier about a lit­tle patch of Nuttall’s milkvetch (Astra­galus nut­tal­lii), a new Cal­i­for­nia native ground­cover I’m try­ing out. Last time, I was pretty enthu­si­as­tic. Now, after eight weeks with less than a quar­ter inch of nat­ural rain­fall, I’m a lit­tle less excited.

At this point, at the end of April/beginning of May, the plant con­tin­ues to be inter­est­ing up close: a mix of red­den­ing stems, small green-gray leaves and dra­matic red-tinged cream-colored pods.

When the seeds have ripened inside the pods, they rat­tle in a really inter­est­ing way. You can see why many Astra­galus are called “rattlepod”:


astragalus-nuttallii-late-season-installation-shot

But the down-side about this plant, I’m find­ing out, is how it looks from a dis­tance. The red stems, whitish pods and green leaves all give the impres­sion of a brown, dying plant. Just squint while look­ing at the next image and you can begin to see that it’s not the most kempt look­ing selec­tion for one of the first things you encounter.

This intro­duc­tion might work well in an infor­mal area, mixed in with big plants that will take up the slack when this one takes a vaca­tion. A spot that gets occa­sional gar­den water also might keep this plant look­ing nicer, longer. But since I planted it at eye-level, right at the front side­walk in a spot that gets no sup­ple­men­tal water all sum­mer, I’ve decided it’s prob­a­bly not the right plant for this spot.

So…I’ve cut it back pretty heav­ily, and it may be out of this spot if it doesn’t look a lot bet­ter quickly. That’s the fate of a lot of Cal­i­for­nia natives: They look great dur­ing the cool, wet grow­ing sea­son, but look less won­der­ful dur­ing when it dries out and get hot­ter, which unfor­tu­nately also hap­pens to be the sea­son when peo­ple want to be out­doors, enjoy­ing their gardens.

Don’t let that dis­cour­age you from plant­ing natives, how­ever. Some of the buck­wheats I’ve planted next to the milkvetch are still green all over and are about to begin their long sea­son of flow­ers and dra­matic dried seed heads. And there are many other options for plants that look good through­out the year. It’s just a mat­ter of find­ing the right plant for the right spot in the garden.

May 02 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy garden | Tags: | 4 Comments »

western dichondra

My par­ents knew a good deal when they saw one. The house they pur­chased in the South­ern Cal­i­for­nia ‘burbs had the required num­ber of bed­rooms, fruit trees in the back, a lawn for the kids to play on, and was located half-way between their jobs. The front yards in the neigh­bor­hood were well main­tained but not splashy.

Some of the houses on the other side of the nearby main boule­vard, how­ever, had immac­u­late high-maintenance gardens–and prob­a­bly had gar­den­ers to go with them. One of the ground­cover choices that some of those houses sported was a dark green dichon­dra lawn, smooth and uni­form as the felt on a pool table. These were lawns that didn’t tol­er­ate much foot traf­fic, required lots of weed­ing, heavy sum­mer water and were meant mainly for show. Com­pared to our lumpy, spiky lawn, these dichon­dra tableaux seemed like the stuff that dreams are made of. (We never would have con­sid­ered that dichon­dra is con­sid­ered a weed in many parts of the country.)

western-dichondra-on-bricks

Jump ahead lots and lots of years to my cur­rent house. Every now and then in one of the raised beds I’d see a plant vol­un­teer under­neath some shrubs or around some bulbs. It sure looked like dichon­dra, but for a long time I thought I wasn’t IDing the plant correctly.

As it turns out the plant really is a dichon­dra, and it’s actu­ally one of the uncom­mon native plants found in coastal sage scrub, chap­ar­ral and oak wood­land habi­tats. The local species, Dichon­dra occi­den­talis, is dis­tinct from the clas­sic lawn plant–one of the sub­tle dis­tin­guish­ing char­ac­ter­is­tics being the sil­ver or brown hairs on the stems. But it’s still a dichon­dra, and I thought its was pretty cool that one of the plants that I’d fetishized grow­ing up some­how man­aged to find me as an adult.

western-dichondra-and-narcissus-shoots

The dichon­dra has self-sowed itself into a cou­ple spots around the house. It now forms a wel­come ground­cover in this raised planter, where a few months ago the nar­cis­sus were break­ing through the soil…

bletilla-striata-alba-with-western-dichondra

…and this is today, with white Chi­nese ground orchids, Bletilla stri­ata alba, bloom­ing away in their bed of soft dichondra.

If you don’t want to wait for the plant to show up on its own, sev­eral Cal­i­for­nia native plant sup­pli­ers offer Dichon­dra occi­den­talis, though it’s def­i­nitely one of the less pop­u­lar items. The plant seems best for me in part-shade. It can take the sum­mer off if you don’t water it, but bi-weekly sprin­klings have kept it around year-round for me, though in sum­mer it’s a lit­tle sparse. But as much as I hate to admit it, I also have a hard time look­ing glam­orous all the time, so I’m will­ing to give this plant a break…

April 10 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy gardenplant profiles | Tags: | 4 Comments »

a new groundcover

astragalus-nuttallii-overall-view1

Here’s a look at a new ground­cover I’m try­ing out. The plant, Nuttall’s milkvetch (Astra­galus nut­tal­lii) is native to coastal Cen­tral Cal­i­for­nia, and seems to be adapt­ing eas­ily to my coastal San Diego loca­tion–maybe a lit­tle too well!

Las Pil­i­tas Nurs­ery, who seems to be the only firm prop­a­gat­ing the species, esti­mates its height to be 3–18 inches and 18 to 36 inches wide. The plant went into the ground Octo­ber 12, and has topped out at a foot or so high–so far so good. But its spread, now at over six feet, has eas­ily hit more than dou­ble the esti­mated max­i­mum plant size. And that’s with no sup­ple­men­tal water­ing after the first cou­ple of months in the ground. We’ll see if it slows down as the weather warms and the ground dries out.

astragalus-nuttallii-flowers1

The milkvetch bore some of these small, ivory-white flow­ers on it in Octo­ber, and it’s never been with­out them in the inter­ven­ing six months. Now that the weather is warm­ing, the plant is get­ting even more inter­ested in flowering.

astragalus-nuttallii-leaves2

As much as I enjoy its flow­ers, my favorite thing about this milkvetch is its del­i­cate foliage. It’s fern-like, and so far has main­tained its clean, green-to-grayish green col­oration. I have the plant at front edge of the retain­ing wall next to the front side­walk, so it’s easy to get face to face with the flow­ers and leaves. A front of the bed loca­tion would also let peo­ple enjoy this del­i­cately tex­tured plant.

So, if you’d like a dis­tinc­tive, del­i­cate, low, mound­ing ground­cover for a dry spot in a zone 9 or 10 land­scape, this might be just the ticket, even if the plant might get a lit­tle wide and need to be cut back.

PS: I should also men­tion that one of this milkvetch’s com­mon names is “locoweed,” and the plant is sup­pos­edly poi­so­nous. I have no idea whether it’s in the cat­e­gory of night­shade or no more dan­ger­ous than tomato plants. Since I have no small chil­dren around or pets that get into any­thing other than cat­nip, I’ve never let an inter­est­ing plant’s sup­posed tox­i­c­ity stop me from grow­ing it. But you might con­sider that before plant­ing a cou­ple acres of it.

March 02 2009 | Categories: gardeningmy gardenplant profiles | Tags: | 8 Comments »