seed bomb controversies

Some­one has declared tomor­row, Octo­ber 9, 2010 as Inter­na­tional Tulip Guer­rilla Gar­den­ing Day. [ Here’s the Face­book event. ] I won’t be dis­cussing tulips, but this post does have a few things to say about guer­rilla gardening.

The local native plant list­serv lit up a few weeks ago over a story in the local paper about seed bombs that ran on August 30.

If you’re not up on seed bombs here’s a lit­tle back­ground: The idea of rolling up seeds and clay to make lit­tle balls that could be lobbed into an area to sow the seeds prob­a­bly goes back cen­turies. But the tech­nique was revi­tal­ized in Japan by Masanobu Fukuoka dur­ing the last cen­tury as part of a low-disturbance style of plant­ing. Instead of till­ing the ground, these lumps of seed and clay could be spread out on the earth’s sur­face, reduc­ing ground dis­tur­bance and the result­ing need to weed so intensely. Up to that point the lit­tle round seed deliv­ery devices were known as seed balls, earth balls or even clay dumplings.

With the rise of the mil­i­tant guer­rilla gar­den­ing move­ment, the lit­tle seed ball became one of the weapons of choice against what was per­ceived as urban blight. An untended vacant lot could be show­ered with with these lit­tle pro­jec­tiles, and a few good rains could see the seeds sprout­ing and tak­ing over what might have been inva­sive weeds. In the testosterone-soaked guer­rilla gar­den move­ment the friendly seed ball quickly became rebranded a “seed bomb.”

Now we return to cur­rent times and the arti­cle I started out men­tion­ing: The orig­i­nal cut of the arti­cle touted how these par­tic­u­lar seed bombs con­tained native species, including–cue the scary music–sweet alyssum! While the definitely-not-native sweet alyssum isn’t one of the top two or three most inva­sive plants, it’s undis­put­edly a prob­lem and has no busi­ness in a seed ball that could get hurled into an wild area by a well-meaning guer­rilla gar­dener. In my own gar­den, a sow­ing of the stuff twenty years ago has led to a sit­u­a­tion of seedlings still pop­ping up every time it rains.

The arti­cle gen­er­ated all sorts of com­ments, and sev­eral peo­ple wrote directly to the maker of these par­tic­u­lar seed bombs men­tioned in the paper, Jim Mum­ford of Green­Scaped Build­ings. One thing led to another and it was revealed that the news­pa­per got hold of a bad list of ingre­di­ents, and that sweet alyssum had never been a part of the mix. The news­pa­per ran a side­bar cor­rec­tion to the story. (The species used to me looks like the Cal­i­for­nia native wild­flower mix offered by S&S Seeds.)

Still by that point the dam­age had been done, and the cre­ator of these par­tic­u­lar balls felt like he needed to show up last month at the lion’s den of the the native plant soci­ety meet­ing to do some dam­age con­trol. He brought us all a big bag of free seed balls. He ran down the real list of species that were really in the mix. He reit­er­ated that sweet alyssum had never been part of the mix.

When it was all over, sev­eral in the audi­ence were say­ing they had no trou­ble with the species used to make the seed balls. The plants were all from Cal­i­for­nia and weren’t con­sid­ered inva­sive. But this was a tough crowd to please and there were still a few lin­ger­ing concerns.

Within the state there are dis­tinct forms of many of the plants in the mix, and each region’s flora has a par­tic­u­lar bal­ance of local plants. If you bring in a non-local strain of a “native” plant you might do some­thing to mess up that bal­ance. Really the only way to make a safe seed bomb that you might lob into a wild area would be to use seed from local plants. Seed bombs are fun, but keep them con­fined to urban gar­dens away from wild­lands and don’t go toss­ing the balls into your neigh­bor­hood canyon think­ing you’re doing the earth a favor.

The story of the San Diego seed bombs has a rel­a­tively happy end­ing. But over the last cou­ple of months I’ve run across a seller who offers “West Coast seed bombs” on Etsy and through a num­ber of bou­tiques. The ven­dor lists the ingre­di­ents as “Corn­flower, Siber­ian Wall­flower, Gar­land Chrysan­the­mum, Shasta Daisy, Farewell-to-Spring, Plains Core­op­sis, Sul­phur Cos­mos, Wild Cos­mos, African Daisy, Sweet William, Cal­i­for­nia Poppy, Blan­ket Flower, Baby’s Breath, Tidy Tips, Moun­tain Phlox, Blue Flax, Sweet Alyssum, Annual Lupine, Lemon Mint, Red Poppy, Rocky Moun­tain Pen­ste­mon, Desert Blue­bell, Mex­i­can Hat, Glo­riosa Daisy, None-so-Pretty, Prairie Cone­flower, and Black-eyed Susan.” Not only does this mix include sweet alyssum, it con­tains gar­land chrysan­the­mum, one of our local scourges. Some parts of the coun­try also have prob­lems with the baby’s breath.

The issue of inva­sives aside, it makes me won­der about people’s def­i­n­i­tions of what con­sti­tutes a wild­flower. Siber­ian wall­flower on the West Coast? African daisy?

I got in touch with the mak­ers of these seed bombs, and they were quite respon­sive, say­ing “we are con­tin­u­ally devel­op­ing this prod­uct. Your feed­back will help inform our prod­uct going for­ward and is much appre­ci­ated. We will gladly include infor­ma­tion about the dan­ger of inva­sive species in our prod­uct from here for­ward.” And they asked for sug­ges­tions for plants that would be bet­ter cit­i­zens in a West Coast wild­flower mix. Off the top of my head I referred them to the list accom­pa­ny­ing the arti­cle, and added just a few ideas of Cal­i­for­nia natives not on the list: baby blue eyes, fivespot, coast sun­flower, desert marigold. What oth­ers would you recommend?

If the mak­ers of these seed balls dras­ti­cally change their mix we could have another rel­a­tively happy end­ing. Most of us prob­a­bly have non-native plants in our gar­dens. If what hap­pens in the gar­den stays in the gar­den, then it’s not quite a doom and gloom sce­nario. But we def­i­nitely have a prob­lem if peo­ple start throw­ing seed bombs into the wilds.

In this case, accom­pa­ny­ing the seed balls with a note about the poten­tial threat of inva­sive plants could do as much good as refor­mu­lat­ing the mix.

October 08 2010 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 12 Comments »

two surprises

Last week I was leav­ing the library and over­heard three ath­letic young men out­side hav­ing a dis­cus­sion. One of them said one of the fol­low­ing sentences:

  • Great game last night!”
  • I’m tired of study­ing, lets get some brews.”
  • Dude, I just love the way jas­mine smells!

If you picked the last one, you would be cor­rect. I guess I was a lit­tle sur­prised at what was the sub­ject of con­ver­sa­tion among three col­lege jocks.

library-entrance-with-jasmine

The library entrance is flanked by two planters full of jas­mine that are sit­u­ated high over the walk­way. When the jas­mine blooms, there’s no miss­ing the aroma.

library-mystery-plant-with-jasmine

I took the stairs up to the level of the beds last week. There, I was sur­prised to find that one of the planters con­tains a lit­tle more than jas­mine. To my eyes it looks like some­one has staged a lit­tle guer­rilla gar­den­ing oper­a­tion: Pok­ing through the mono­cul­ture of the flow­er­ing vines were lit­tle plants of yarrow, gaura, a pink-flowered mint rel­a­tive (any­one know what this is from the photo?), and some­thing else not in bloom that I can’t iden­tity in its green, leafy state. The bed on the other side is just plain jas­mine, as it’s been for the last 18 years. If this were offi­cially sanc­tioned land­scap­ing, they would have made the plant­ing sym­met­ri­cal and intro­duced these lit­tle plants on the other side.

library-yarrow

It’s all a lit­tle chaotic. I think I like it.

June 03 2009 | Categories: gardening | Tags: | 6 Comments »

reclamation

The house behind us has a back fence that is about fif­teen feet behind our rear fence. Between the two is a no-man’s-land of unmain­tained ice­plant, ivy and what­ever else has escaped from the adja­cent gar­dens. In some neigh­bor­hoods this might be the loca­tion for a back alley. But with lot of the back house ris­ing six feet over ours, the land is too sloped to accom­mo­date much more than a nar­row con­crete cul­vert to drain the slope behind us and keep the infre­quent rains from inun­dat­ing all of us below.

A view of the Back 40

A view of the Back 40

We have a gate that leads into this space of ambigu­ous own­er­ship, but I’d never spent much time back there until a recent project to repair the fence.

I looked with con­tempt at the thick mat of ice­plant. Botan­i­cal shag car­pet­ing, I thought. Every ignored space in town is cov­ered with it. It does next to noth­ing to pro­vide habi­tat for the local fauna. Although it’s often planted to sta­bi­lize a slope, its weight can actu­ally pull the slope down more than hold it in place. Yes, it’s very drought-tolerant, and it’s ser­vice­able in some sit­u­a­tions. But the plant for me usu­ally rep­re­sents a colos­sal fail­ure of the imag­i­na­tion. We can do bet­ter than this.

I just hap­pened to have two pots of seedlings of the native sacred datura, a.k.a. toloache, a.k.a. Datura wrightii. The plant eas­ily grows six or more feet across, and I real­is­ti­cally had no space for it in the gar­den around the house. The light­bulb over my head came on.

One of the daturas planted in the back 40

One of the dat­uras planted in the back 40

It’s amaz­ing what ten min­utes with a trowel, a water­ing can and two pots of plants can accom­plish. In this sec­ond photo, lower right, is one of the datura seedlings that I inserted into the thatch under the iceplant.

I must admit that after plant­ing them I for­got to water them for almost a week of dry weather well into the eight­ies. Expect­ing to see car­nage, I was sur­prised to instead see the plants look­ing at least as happy as they were in their seed pots. I gave them another drink of water, but that may be all they’ll require from here on out. Start­ing next spring, I’m hop­ing to bee able to see their amaz­ing morning-glory flow­ers from my deck, unfurl­ing at dusk to greet the night.

From my last walk in the local wilds I came home with a nap­kin folded around the seeds of another plant I pre­vi­ously didn’t have room for. I’m thrilled. I’ve got a whole new plot to garden.

November 25 2008 | Categories: gardeningmy garden | Tags: | 2 Comments »

guerrilla gardening

A topic that’s mak­ing its rounds these days is the prac­tice of guer­rilla gardening.

It can take dif­fer­ent forms, but what’s being talked about most are “seed bomb­ing” and stealth­ily tak­ing over neglected pub­lic spaces.

Richard Reynolds in Lon­don has just released a book, On Guer­rilla Gar­den­ing, and that’s caus­ing a lot of the buzz. The hiply “crim­i­nal” nature of what he’s doing has given Reynolds a cer­tain aura. Even Adi­das is try­ing to tap into it with a pro­posal for an adver­tis­ing cam­paign. Think of the “edgy” caché that Shep­ard Fairey devel­oped with his “Obey” cam­paign of guerrilla-applied posters fea­tur­ing Andre the Giant. In addi­tion to now doing sig­nage for the Obama cam­paign, Fairey has taken that celebrity and chan­neled into an art and mar­ket­ing career. Reynolds is poised to do some­thing similar.

In addi­tion to Lon­don the prac­tice is hap­pen­ing all over: Berlin, New York, Long Beach in California–lots of places. In Long Beach, for instance, some­one recently named in an arti­cle only as “Scott” has been beau­ti­fy­ing neglected traf­fic medi­ans by plant­ing them with attrac­tive land­scap­ing. What’s really to his credit is that he weeds and oth­er­wise main­tains the spaces, and he’s been doing this for ten years, more than twice as long as Reynolds.

In the same arti­cle, Ramon Arevalo, Super­in­ten­dent of Grounds Main­te­nance for Long Beach, has said that he has no prob­lem with “Scott’s” ille­gal activ­ity. “If you want to do this, my advice is to con­tact myself or the coun­cil per­son. We want to part­ner with peo­ple who care about where they live.”

That sounds like the seed bomb for a whole new pro­gram cities could develop. Why not part­ner peo­ple who want to grow liv­ing things with gov­ern­ments in pos­ses­sion of butt-ugly patches of untended land?

Here in San Diego there are sev­eral beau­ti­fi­ca­tion pro­grams in and around the city where artists are invited to dec­o­rate the mun­dane elec­tri­cal uti­til­ity boxes that pop­u­late street cor­ners and front yards. Hun­dreds of boxes have sported inter­est­ing new paintjobs as a result. Why not do some­thing sim­i­lar with those dead zones spread through­out most cities by get­ting peo­ple to par­tic­i­pate in beau­ti­fy­ing their sur­round­ings by plant­ing gar­dens in neglected spaces?

And–here’s a rad­i­cal idea–why not pay them some­thing to do it?!

June 17 2008 | Categories: artgardeninglandscape design | Tags: | 3 Comments »