matters of taste

Rebecca Sol­nit wrote an essay for Extreme Hor­ti­cul­ture,* a book by pho­tog­ra­pher John Pfahl who was the sub­ject of one of this blog’s first posts. I bumped into the essay again as I was skim­ming through an anthol­ogy I’d read last year, Solnit’s Storm­ing the Gates of Par­adise: Land­scapes for Pol­i­tics. Here’s a frag­ment that I found really inter­est­ing, part of her essay, “The Botan­i­cal Circus.”

There is a whole lan­guage of class in the garden–when they returned to the gar­den, flow­ers were redeemed with the taste­ful mono­chro­matic schemes of the likes of Gertrude Jekyll; and, as gar­den­ing essay­ist Michael Pol­lan points out, there is a whole class war of the roses, in which old roses–more fra­grant, more softly shaped, less abun­dant in their bloom, more lim­ited in the palette–are the exiled aris­toc­racy. Good taste is about renun­ci­a­tion: you must have enough to restrain in order to value restraint, enough abun­dance to prize aus­ter­ity. After all, it was only after ani­line dyes made bright cloth­ing uni­ver­sally avail­able that the priv­i­leged stopped dress­ing like pea­cocks; spare­ness is often the pub­lic face of excess…Moderation, the Greek philoso­pher said, is pleas­ant to the wise, but it’s not nec­es­sar­ily fun. Eleanor Perényi writes in her book Green Thoughts: A Writer in the Gar­den,

Look­ing at my dahlias one sum­mer day, a friend whose taste runs to the small and impec­ca­ble said sadly, “You do like big con­spic­u­ous flow­ers, don’t you?” She meant vul­gar, and I am used to that. It hasn’t escaped me that mine is the only WASP gar­den in town to con­tain dahlias, and not the dis­creet lit­tle sin­gles either. Some are as blowsy as half-dressed Renoir girls; oth­ers are like spiky sea-creatures, water lilies, or the spi­rals in a crys­tal paper­weight; and they do shoot up to prodi­gious heights. But to me they are sump­tu­ous, not vulgar.

I’ve gone on in some posts about the neces­sity to rein in color choices to achieve some sort of har­mony. But then I’ve writ­ten about won­der­fully vul­gar, er…sump­tu­ous, plants like toloache and Echium wild­pret­tii. I really do like a cer­tain amount of order, but at the same I do appre­ci­ate these flam­ing agents of chaos. I may achieve pock­ets of “good taste” in the yard, but these are tem­pered by the bawdy and outrageous.

So what’s your gar­den like? Care­fully coor­di­nated and muted like a wardrobe from J. Crew or Land’s End? Or sassy and out­ra­geous like Martha Stew­art in hot pants and five-inch cha-cha heels?

A note on my links to books: The book links in all of my posts (with only one excep­tion that I can think of) take you to abebooks.com, a site made up of hun­dreds of book­sellers around the world, a good many of them the lit­tle brick and mor­tar oper­a­tions that are dying out too quickly as giants like Ama­zon take over publishing.

July 31 2008 | Categories: gardeningquotesrambles | Tags: | 1 Comment »

coda: John Pfahl

A few posts ago I wrote about the gar­den pho­tog­ra­phy of John Pfahl. Four of the works from this series are in the exhi­bi­tion, Pic­tur­ing Eden, at San Diego’s Museum of Pho­to­graphic Arts. The show runs through Jan­u­ary 13, 2008.

The show has a lot of work in it on the gen­eral theme of par­adises, whether they be gained, lost, regained or cre­ated. The show is curated by Deb­o­rah Klochko, and had its ori­gins at George East­man House Inter­na­tional Museum of Pho­tog­ra­phy and Film. I had almost no time to look at the work, but there were def­i­nitely some great images. I’ll try to write up some­thing a lit­tle more exten­sive later…

December 01 2007 | Categories: artphotography | Tags: | No Comments »

extreme gardening

In the late 90s I was for­tu­nate to be part of a show of pho­tog­ra­phy at San Fran­cisco Cam­er­a­work, enti­tled Feed, that cen­tered on our rela­tion­ship with food. One of the artists in the show was one of my pho­to­graphic heroes, John Pfahl, who in the 1970s pro­duced his funny and quirk­ily beau­ti­ful Altered Land­scapes series. In that San Fran­cisco show he was rep­re­sented by images of com­post, Very Rich Hours of a Com­post Pile.

The work that I’d to say a few things about are his doc­u­ments of over-the-top gar­den­scapes, his Extreme Hor­ti­cul­ture series.

Dr. Wadsworth's Tree

John Pfahl: Dr. Wadsworth’s Tree, Chatauqua, N.Y.

These are all beau­ti­ful, color-soaked images, most of them of the sort of gar­dens where “nat­ural” isn’t a word that would imme­di­ately spring to mind. The raw plant mate­ri­als are often gor­geous, but they’re sheared, arranged and manip­u­lated in ways where the hand of the gar­dener or designer is in-your-face obvi­ous. Often gar­dens like that give me the creeps. They and talk to a cul­ture where a country’s Pres­i­dent is often shown on his Craw­ford, Texas ranch, clear­ing brush, like he’s some sort of rep­re­sen­ta­tive of good human­ity bat­tling the evil forces of nature that want to over­run our bound­aries. Most of Pfahl’s gar­dens are testos­terone gar­dens, gar­dens all about con­trol, gar­dens all about dom­i­na­tion. But at the same time, they’re often beau­ti­ful or funny in their over­man­i­cured way.

Bare Trees and Topiary

John Pfahl: Bare Trees and Top­i­ary, Long­wood Gar­dens, Kensett Square, PA

Espalier Demonstration

John Pfahl: Espalier Demon­stra­tion, Long­wood Gar­dens, Kensett Square, PA

Pfahl Getty Garden

John Pfahl: Cac­tus Gar­den, J. Paul Getty Cen­ter, Los Ange­les, California

Maybe I’m over­gen­er­al­iz­ing, but the East Coast gar­dens pic­tured seem heavy into shap­ing plants into top­i­aried sculp­tures. It’s a heav­ily Euro­pean thing–Just think of the immaculately-worked gar­dens at Ver­sailles. The West­ern gar­dens seem to show a lit­tle more inter­est in and respect for the mate­ri­als. Plants are placed where the designer wants them, but they seem to be cho­sen more for what they can do in that loca­tion, rather than what can be done to them. The arrange­ments of cac­tus and suc­cu­lents at the Getty, for instance, show clear thought about where the plants were placed. But the plants are allowed more to be them­selves. (And I won­der if that free­dom some­how also trans­lates into free­doms that peo­ple are allowed to have…) Besides, have you ever tried to prune a cactus?

The ten­sion of nat­ural ten­den­cies ver­sus con­trol is one that’s always inter­est­ing to me. Nature often isn’t con­ve­nient, and it’s often never where we want it to be. Scrap­ing a hill­side to put in sub­ur­ban hous­ing and pulling up an errant weed are part of the same con­tin­uum. But where do you draw the line about what’s good and what’s bad? Is keep­ing a gar­den inher­ently bet­ter than bull­doz­ing native scrub to build more mcman­sions? I think the answer is yes, but the ques­tion is a com­pli­cated one. There’s eco­nom­ics, notions of jus­tice, respect for liv­ing things, and all sorts of other things that have to be con­sid­ered. It’s an intrigu­ing ques­tion that resides not far below the sur­face of John Pfahl’s photographs.

November 25 2007 | Categories: artgardeninglandscape designphotography | Tags: | 3 Comments »