more waterlily photos to share

Here in South­ern Cal­i­for­nia sum­mer slips into the dol­drums as the weather heats up and the land dries out. If only we had shal­low lakes every­where we might have acres of waterlilies bloom­ing their heads off. Things might look a lit­tle bit like this…


Jenny was at Long­wood Gar­dens in Penn­syl­va­nia recently and sent me these pho­tos of their water gar­dens. (Thanks, Jenny!) She was struck by their flow­ers, but was really drawn to the foliage. It’s easy to love the var­ie­gated ones, but the crin­kled edges on the other vari­eties are awfully cool too. These are all waterlilies but for one, the plant with­out blooms. I’ll try to get the name of the from her, but if any of the rest of you know what it is, just drop a note.

Of course, hav­ing a body of water in a warm cli­mate is no guar­an­tee that water plants will thrive. Last year, up in Los Ange­les, the Echo Park Lotus Fes­ti­val took place. But after cel­e­brat­ing the bloom­ing of the water lotuses every year since 1972, there were no lotus blooms to show. Ear­lier this month they went ahead and held the annual cel­e­bra­tion, but this time it was re-branded the Echo Park Com­mu­nity Fes­ti­val. No lotuses. Sad.

July 24 2009 | Categories: gardeningplaces | Tags: | 1 Comment »

extreme gardening

In the late 90s I was for­tu­nate to be part of a show of pho­tog­ra­phy at San Fran­cisco Cam­er­a­work, enti­tled Feed, that cen­tered on our rela­tion­ship with food. One of the artists in the show was one of my pho­to­graphic heroes, John Pfahl, who in the 1970s pro­duced his funny and quirk­ily beau­ti­ful Altered Land­scapes series. In that San Fran­cisco show he was rep­re­sented by images of com­post, Very Rich Hours of a Com­post Pile.

The work that I’d to say a few things about are his doc­u­ments of over-the-top gar­den­scapes, his Extreme Hor­ti­cul­ture series.

Dr. Wadsworth's Tree

John Pfahl: Dr. Wadsworth’s Tree, Chatauqua, N.Y.

These are all beau­ti­ful, color-soaked images, most of them of the sort of gar­dens where “nat­ural” isn’t a word that would imme­di­ately spring to mind. The raw plant mate­ri­als are often gor­geous, but they’re sheared, arranged and manip­u­lated in ways where the hand of the gar­dener or designer is in-your-face obvi­ous. Often gar­dens like that give me the creeps. They and talk to a cul­ture where a country’s Pres­i­dent is often shown on his Craw­ford, Texas ranch, clear­ing brush, like he’s some sort of rep­re­sen­ta­tive of good human­ity bat­tling the evil forces of nature that want to over­run our bound­aries. Most of Pfahl’s gar­dens are testos­terone gar­dens, gar­dens all about con­trol, gar­dens all about dom­i­na­tion. But at the same time, they’re often beau­ti­ful or funny in their over­man­i­cured way.

Bare Trees and Topiary

John Pfahl: Bare Trees and Top­i­ary, Long­wood Gar­dens, Kensett Square, PA

Espalier Demonstration

John Pfahl: Espalier Demon­stra­tion, Long­wood Gar­dens, Kensett Square, PA

Pfahl Getty Garden

John Pfahl: Cac­tus Gar­den, J. Paul Getty Cen­ter, Los Ange­les, California

Maybe I’m over­gen­er­al­iz­ing, but the East Coast gar­dens pic­tured seem heavy into shap­ing plants into top­i­aried sculp­tures. It’s a heav­ily Euro­pean thing–Just think of the immaculately-worked gar­dens at Ver­sailles. The West­ern gar­dens seem to show a lit­tle more inter­est in and respect for the mate­ri­als. Plants are placed where the designer wants them, but they seem to be cho­sen more for what they can do in that loca­tion, rather than what can be done to them. The arrange­ments of cac­tus and suc­cu­lents at the Getty, for instance, show clear thought about where the plants were placed. But the plants are allowed more to be them­selves. (And I won­der if that free­dom some­how also trans­lates into free­doms that peo­ple are allowed to have…) Besides, have you ever tried to prune a cactus?

The ten­sion of nat­ural ten­den­cies ver­sus con­trol is one that’s always inter­est­ing to me. Nature often isn’t con­ve­nient, and it’s often never where we want it to be. Scrap­ing a hill­side to put in sub­ur­ban hous­ing and pulling up an errant weed are part of the same con­tin­uum. But where do you draw the line about what’s good and what’s bad? Is keep­ing a gar­den inher­ently bet­ter than bull­doz­ing native scrub to build more mcman­sions? I think the answer is yes, but the ques­tion is a com­pli­cated one. There’s eco­nom­ics, notions of jus­tice, respect for liv­ing things, and all sorts of other things that have to be con­sid­ered. It’s an intrigu­ing ques­tion that resides not far below the sur­face of John Pfahl’s photographs.

November 25 2007 | Categories: artgardeninglandscape designphotography | Tags: | 3 Comments »