lurie garden in february

chicago-lurie-snow

I’m not sure what I was expect­ing out of Chicago’s Lurie Gar­den in the mid­dle of February.

The core of the gar­den is a space con­cen­trat­ing on peren­ni­als planted by Piet Oudolf, and the win­ter gar­den was defined by what peren­ni­als do in the win­ter. Even though Oudolf has selected plants that main­tain strong pro­files into the win­ter, the gar­den looks like it’s seen bet­ter days. But really, that’s the out­look that the designer brings to the gar­den: Things change. Plants grow, bloom, die back. (Oudolf’s book Design­ing with Plants, after all, even has a chap­ter called “Death.” What feel-good gar­den book would even dare to acknowl­edge such a thing?)

chicago-lurie-with-skyline

The path through the heart of the gar­den was off-limits—I guess they were wor­ried about peo­ple slip­ping and falling on the frozen walk­ways. Still, you can expe­ri­ence the garden’s perime­ter with the Chicago sky­line behind it. There you see the died back remains of last year’s growth: tall, dark spires of fox­glove rel­a­tives (prob­a­bly Dig­i­talis fer­rug­inea or parv­i­flora); light brown clumps of var­i­ous grasses; del­i­cate, expres­sive cur­tains of bur­net (San­guisorba offi­cianalis alba).

No gar­dener can begin to know every plant on earth, so I’m depend­ing on my iden­ti­fi­ca­tion on the garden’s ter­rific plant list that you can find online and on what I know from Oudolf’s books to be some of his favorite plants. (Actu­ally, the Plant Life of the Lurie Gar­den pages have not only plant lists, but pho­tos and cul­tural tips on most of the plants in the gar­den. It got to be one of the most impres­sive online guides to a garden.)

Although prob­a­bly most famous in the gar­den com­mu­nity for the peren­nial plant­i­ngs, the Lurie Gar­den was actu­ally over­seen by Kathryn Gustafson (with other mem­bers of her firm, Gustafson, Guthrie, Nicholand) with input from artist/set designer Robert Israel. Gustafson con­tributed the over­all land­scape design, while Israel is cred­ited with the “con­cep­tual review,” sig­nalling that this is a gar­den of ideas as much as it is a gar­den of plantings.

chicago-lurie-hedge-1

The cen­tral gar­den fea­tures two sec­tions, a “light plate” and a “dark plate,” rep­re­sent­ing tec­tonic geo­log­i­cal forces. (Kustafson’s office is in Port­land, Israel is based in Los Ange­les. Both are loca­tions where peo­ple think more about geo­log­i­cal move­ment than they do here in Chicago.) Pro­tect­ing the gar­den on two sides is this giant arma­ture that will mature into a hedge that rep­re­sents Chicago as the city of “broad shoul­ders,” as made famous in Carl Sandburg’s 1916 poem, “Chicago.”

chicago-lurie-hedge-3

With Oudolf’s plants now retreat­ing into the ground or only defined by ghosts of them­selves, it’s Gustafson’s con­tri­bu­tion that you notice most in the mid­dle of win­ter. The curi­ous struc­ture of dark steel with dark metal cables looks like a zoo pen con­tain­ing tightly planted alter­nat­ing blocks of dif­fer­ent arborvi­tae vari­eties and decid­u­ous horn­beam and Euro­pean beech. One of the decid­u­ous trees is inter­est­ing in that it that holds on to its leaves through the win­ter. As the year pro­gresses, I can see the decid­u­ous plants leaf­ing out at dif­fer­ent times, reduc­ing the con­trast between the ever­greens and the broadleaf trees.

chicago-lurie-hedge-2

The effect of the caged green­ery is an odd effect, for sure. Any clipped hedge talks about the con­trol of nature, and to put nature in a cage like this, like a botan­i­cal zoo, rein­forces that almost vio­lent act. It’s not a “pretty” effect, and I’m not sure I love it. But it catches my inter­est and rein­forces this as a gar­den of ideas.

In the end I guess my reac­tion to the Lurie Gar­den in Feb­ru­ary is sim­i­lar to what I feel when I hold a dor­mant bulb. I can appre­ci­ate the thing in its cur­rent state, but it’s the hope and knowl­edge of what it can do that really keeps me inter­ested. It’s not really fair to try to give it a fair read in the mid­dle of win­ter. Too bad I won’t be back every cou­ple of months to check on its progress.

chicago-lurie-monetIf star­ing at died-down peren­ni­als and caged shrub­bery isn’t your cup of java, all you need to do to cross the street to the Art Insti­tute of Chicago. There you’ll find all sorts of amaz­ing art­work cel­e­brat­ing warm, green land­scapes, includ­ing this lily pond by Monet…

chicago-lurie-gaughin-2…and this Tahit­ian land­scape by Gaughin.

Paint­ings and so much of what humans do is all about per­ma­nence and things not chang­ing. We pur­pose­fully make things that resist change, whether it’s paint that doesn’t fade or Twinkies that will prob­a­bly remain as edi­ble in three decades as they are today. The gar­den across the street cel­e­brates what does change.

Give the gar­den just a few months. The peren­ni­als will be spec­tac­u­lar once spring gets going. And the “hedge” will fill in over the next decade and read more like a hedge than a zoo exhibit.

chicago-lurie-gehry-2

chicago-lurie-gehry-1

When you’re vis­it­ing the Lurie Gar­den you’ll be just a few dozen steps from Frank Gehry’s brawny new shell for pops con­certs on a lawn cov­ered by this lat­tice trel­lis structure.

chicago-lurie-bean

And then there’s this sculp­ture by Anish Kapoor titled “The Cloud Gate”–which the locals have dubbed “the bean.” It’s major fun to walk around its con­cave and con­vex sur­faces that give you this cool, dis­torted reflec­tion of the skyline.

chicago-lurie-bean-self-portrait

With its con­vex exte­rior and con­cave inte­rior, this is art­work that will make you look fat, a fact that this self-portrait can attest to…

I’m not sure whether it was inten­tional, but the Gehry band­shell and the Kapoor sculp­ture and the shoul­der hedge of the gar­den all fea­ture steel–a mate­r­ial that makes pos­si­ble the sky­line that rises around them. Chicago with­out steel? Unthinkable.

And now, Chicago with­out the Lurie Gar­den, the Gehry band­shell and the Kapoor Cloud Gate? Unthink­able, as well.

February 27 2009 | Categories: artgardeninglandscape designplaces | Tags: | 5 Comments »

chicago in…february?

Work will be tak­ing me to Chicago in mid-February. My first reac­tion to the con­fer­ence orga­niz­ers’ choice of loca­tion and time was some­thing approach­ing dis­be­lief. Chicago in Feb­ru­ary? I don’t have that many lay­ers of cloth­ing in my closet!

Mind you, you’re lis­ten­ing to a wimp from San Diego. I’ve been get­ting dis­tressed that the nights are start­ing to drop below 50 degrees. I feel like I need to count my fin­gers and toes every time I come back indoors to be sure they haven’t frozen off.

My first trip to Chicago as an adult was just over a decade ago, and I quickly fell in love with all the cul­tural ben­e­fits of the place. Its muse­ums, archi­tec­ture and restau­rants are noth­ing short of amaz­ing. Those are all pretty much indoor things, how­ever. What’s a wimpy sub­trop­i­cal gar­dener and out­doors per­son to do?

On the top of my list of things to see in Chicago is the Lurie Gar­den, designed by Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd, Piet Oudolf and Robert Israel. Aside from the Bat­tery in New York, I believe it’s Oudolf’s only pub­lic work in the U.S.

Left: The Lurie Gar­den in June. (Photo by Tor­sodog via the Wiki­me­dia Com­mons [ source ])

But the gar­den in Feb­ru­ary? Even though Oudolf tries to incor­po­rate nat­ural cycles into his designs, cre­at­ing spaces that honor and cel­e­brate the nat­ural changes in the world, I sus­pect that Feb­ru­ary will be a harsh test.

Still, even if it’s an amaz­ing place in Feb­ru­ary, I’ll know that I’ll have missed one of the main points of the gar­den. This is a garden-as-process. It’s not about look­ing gor­geous for a few weeks of the year. Instead it’s ded­i­cated to the changes that hap­pen as the sea­sons progress. (From the pho­tos I’ve seen, it also hap­pens to look great most of the year…)

It’ll be like step­ping into a con­cert hall to hear a few quiet min­utes of a piece of music that lasts much longer. Even if those few min­utes are amaz­ing, that music is a liv­ing thing that has a life longer that what you’ve expe­ri­enced. You leave the hall sens­ing that you’ve missed some amaz­ing moments.

I sus­pect that’ll be how I feel after I leave Chicago.

December 11 2008 | Categories: gardeninglandscapeplaces | Tags: | 2 Comments »

“away from the soft pornography of the flower”">away from the soft pornography of the flower”

The quote in the title is from a state­ment by Charles Wald­heim about the work of land­scape designer Piet Oudolf in a Jan­u­ary 31 arti­cle in the New York Times, “A land­scape in win­ter, dying hero­ically.” (I ran across this in a post to Alexan­der Trevi’s inter­est­ing Pruned blog.)


Pho­tos by Her­man Wouters for the New York Times article.

One of Oudolf’s inter­ests is in con­struct­ing land­scapes that acknowl­edge the cycles of nature, the brown­ing and the dying, along with the green­ing and regrowth.

You look at this, and it goes deeper than what you see,” Oudolf is quoted. “It reminds you of some­thing in the genes—nature, or the long­ing for nature.”

You accept death. You don’t take the plants out, because they still look good. And brown is also a color.”

These are gar­dens about deeper things. They’re as beau­ti­ful as all those merely skin-deep gar­dens, but they’re so much more nour­ish­ing. I wrote ear­lier refer­ring to a com­ment about Monet’s gar­dens being designed to expose nat­ural processes. Oudolf’s gar­dens do the same thing, and I’d love to be able spend some time lost in his landscapes…

Piet Oudolf’s website.

April 09 2008 | Categories: gardeninglandscape design | Tags: | 1 Comment »